Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: intel_ehl_pse_gpio: Introduce Intel Elkhart Lake PSE GPIO and TIO

Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-04T11:33:50Z

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:25:00AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:20:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:47:29PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:22:41PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:14:35PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:45:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:39:16PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:24:43AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:17:41AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:

...

> > > > > > > > > +INTEL GPIO MFD DRIVER
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This also needs to be more precise and follow the name. We have more Intel GPIO
> > > > > > > > drivers, and MFD doesn't ring any bell about the platform or so. Are you going
> > > > > > > > to support all of them (existing and comining)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not that it is planned as of now but I wouldn't mind :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It sounds like solving the problem that even might never appear :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Right, somehow that sounds familiar :D
> > > >
> > > > So, can we rename the MAINTAINERS record as the result of our discussion?
> > >
> > > Yep, but perhaps wait a few days for review comments.
> >
> > Sure.
>
> Or can we just add it under INTEL GPIO DRIVERS?

But it's not a GPIO driver. It's a glue between GPIO and PPS drivers to support
such a hardware on some platforms.

> With that I think it'll be in much better hands.

So, I don't think so.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko