From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569861F63E1; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741113814; cv=none; b=MDoCNKGkynwzjjMkHi3rU/AUVCshG22nKcbCB461LPYYVJjPxZGYg6B//9BuiyjV/ivxdsXmNmkOTg8xc6tOAnQPo1CXabBXAloNS/UTBryXj4//y4MEb3SgUWfB4ogHy6HfJUOybUzBhcPwqpt+Fy2yzlrFxgru0mtYXx9AiAc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741113814; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MaCdA5ZR6l7zULNgrfHmO/03rDMi0kLhXHTr9N98E+c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VEyhTYInlLnTFenctD4VHcn4XD/u0X/nVs/KwmbYmYY4o3dyH0DoplKtW83jk4TgS37m9t54edZ9/qQxHGsLW8jy6gqsB1o1Wavl5abY/kChAYtH7fZ0+ybkPjj3jlOAn0CKTDAA7wNlSShPEPrutsF3eEfButeVEuWmLAL2AGQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nqcGzJYU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nqcGzJYU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E66CC4CEE5; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:43:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741113813; bh=MaCdA5ZR6l7zULNgrfHmO/03rDMi0kLhXHTr9N98E+c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nqcGzJYUnUMbMA8p6Xw5DhbbdRmftfzfiR8HsuWPyAXJuhhlK+TWF2FcfQQ+0RS7a LtbXJZWdAVtwFiNexFEBJlaF0uhp2yXqrCIHWviOIOF4W6dJ89ZN8GlQarfJw5yf/4 sgt98rxb8LPG8D6VWFi1ee6Gm2eIJFNIbDPR5GL+ytMrZlGUGXgjMYKQOJPE2PEFKT eDTJg/iTyevfJo2ShASIYpqmOeB0Yotlzd3Vf4Xn4hmBGuAx5fs4tKnYYjqM8sFleT Y+OCIyYa4OEA0C+650mULD98TNs/Z2Joq6PGsBkLEMx92FxWGxjBmsCL0Rfv36gKOo s+KrmRXmasc7Q== Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:43:31 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: Leo Yan Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ian Rogers , James Clark , Mike Leach , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , "Liang, Kan" , Will Deacon , Graham Woodward , Paschalis.Mpeis@arm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] perf script: Refactor branch flags for Arm SPE Message-ID: References: <20250217195908.176207-1-leo.yan@arm.com> <20250303093853.GG2157064@e132581.arm.com> <20250304113350.GK2157064@e132581.arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250304113350.GK2157064@e132581.arm.com> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:33:50AM +0000, Leo Yan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:00:19PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 09:38:53AM +0000, Leo Yan wrote: > > > Hi Arnaldo, Namhyung, > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 07:58:56PM +0000, Leo Yan wrote: > > > > This patch series refactors branch flags for support Arm SPE. The patch > > > > set is divided into two parts, the first part is for refactoring common > > > > code and the second part is for enabling Arm SPE. > > > > > > James has given review tags (including the new added patch 06). Could > > > you kindly pick up this series? > > > > > > Sorry for pushing a bit, as we have dependency on it. > > > > No problem, I'll add it to the tmp branch and run some tests. > > Thanks a lot, Namhyung! > > I saw you have picked patch series v3 in the tmp.perf-tools-next branch. > On the other hand, to follow up on Adrian's comment, I have sent out > v4 to remove an unnecessary change in patch 01, and the rest of the > patches are exactly the same as v3. > > Please consider picking the latest change (either the whole v4 series or > just the updated patch 01 would be fine). Sure, I'll add v4 to the tmp branch soon. Thanks, Namhyung