The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	paulmck@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: Disable DL server if sysctl_sched_rt_runtime is -1
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:30:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8gZuaAavG42unZb@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304234744.GA2283516@joelnvbox>

Hi Joel,

On 04/03/25 18:47, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:06:32PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue,  4 Mar 2025 15:01:16 -0500
> > Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Currently, RCU boost testing in rcutorture is broken because it relies on
> > > having RT throttling disabled. This means the test will always pass (or
> > > rarely fail). This occurs because recently, RT throttling was replaced
> > > by DL server which boosts CFS tasks even when rcutorture tried to
> > > disable throttling (see rcu_torture_disable_rt_throttle()).
> > > 
> > > Therefore this patch prevents DL server from starting when RC torture
> > > sets the sysctl_sched_rt_runtime to -1.
> > > 
> > > With this patch, boosting in TREE09 fails more than 50% of boost attempts
> > > making the test more useful.
> > > 
> > > Also add a check of this to task_non_contending() because otherwise it
> > > throws a warning (in the case when DL server was already started before
> > > rcutorture started).
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm, I wonder if dl_server caused a regression. That is, disabling rt
> > throttling should allow RT tasks to starve anything it wants. And some RT
> > applications rely on this.
> > 
> > Should this include a Fixes and Cc stable?
> 
> Yeah that makes sense to me, I'll include the Fixes tag in the v2.

Not entirely sure we want to link the (legacy?) sched_rt_runtime
interface to DL server, as it has its own new interface at

/sys/kernel/debug/sched/fair_server/cpuX/*

Admittedly thought the latter is a debug interface, which is not ideal.

I was thinking we might want/need to add a kernel cmdline parameter to
tweak DL server parameters at boot (and possibly disable it), but it is
indeed less flexible than an interface tweakable at runtime.

If we end up using sched_rt_runtime (and _period) to tweak DL server I
believe we should make sure changes are consistent with the debug
interface at least.

Peter, what do you think?

Thanks,
Juri


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 20:01 [PATCH RFC] sched: Disable DL server if sysctl_sched_rt_runtime is -1 Joel Fernandes
2025-03-04 20:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-03-04 23:47   ` Joel Fernandes
2025-03-05  9:30     ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2025-03-05 19:55       ` Joel Fernandes
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-04 20:01 Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8gZuaAavG42unZb@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
    --to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox