From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B22F2E3361 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741191517; cv=none; b=IFyVPMd9oKIOcBhRUyuGHyO6Rh13shU2mNRheTVyJsLg160IXRMlmVkGziNCSIxqUvxqQtP81njMNY3hF3DwHPOdWo6ETNcsq3owogJ4IwTd+WF+h3uBvZEHpCYmaJGwJ2n5spp8ve8IcM5HtPlV9xaf7JIaYdefdlGP9q6ynhM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741191517; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+BPUt8lHDc3+pod8h5vk3760BpjXxiNMN6F5ieHmpI8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=odcNz5UHQrgnlRIaxvPXqlMoTadjjoHotdd5vFO58PBcz94YaFOk7tTn1SMmehltOiD6ctTiSnKszTzllRYOeVKsmcGKMgJtJcGOBPnG2hAHQYbkC4zLktOYVbHaEwY+66Aclyq89fg68vxG+h3DhNBJF+clnBCvfB8WBY9E79w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=orXjR8AV; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=qMZAhEYx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="orXjR8AV"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="qMZAhEYx" Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 17:18:32 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1741191514; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nQ69AeXYPTOT/EG4vDrbaZmzkRTmmMycyz4TxqzIVco=; b=orXjR8AVB9FAw6U1sFUzFNVGvKfQGQ037gCU+OkS4kNT+bardxvkqwoGdUzLuP9V2047a8 iSdwIIPoHZKT6mieSZ/Oiq9xtFcNr3anuZsodriWwWUVJwThSQhPVKQvCHmN4WFDrfT1uz /t9G6cIGe/2JstIYCNgcKPAdr9h8b+L7ul86T6yxE4NECIRKjinb25qGxhePzoZniL3EY9 L5YGM4XRnVsJwNwOhAOGQCcVxswOg2LMBgHo6Yr0DS0fi4XveldfxS9mp30s7Mfpu6cUvB AiLxv5Sz04VMRRU6Ah3ZdMEXogEUIs067KkAxL6oE7kNITw/j1xuLEy+HCg4TA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1741191514; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nQ69AeXYPTOT/EG4vDrbaZmzkRTmmMycyz4TxqzIVco=; b=qMZAhEYxxBcHohs1muQ+wBkQRw40Zh+UYpJwMbWK0bAkVO3W/FUpqkqfxYeig9ZeETHYms 9aNJ5LIBYGNvCaAQ== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , John Ogness , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Cooper , x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 30/40] sizes.h: Cover all possible x86 cpu cache sizes Message-ID: References: <20250304085152.51092-1-darwi@linutronix.de> <20250304085152.51092-31-darwi@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Ingo, On Tue, 04 Mar 2025, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > > > Add size macros for 24/192/384 Kilobyes and 3/6/12/18/24 Megabytes. > > > > With that, the x86 subsystem can avoid locally defining its own macros > > for CPU cache sizs. > > Please take some time to read your own changelogs: > > s/Kilobyes > /Kilobytes > > s/sizs > /sizes > Sorry about that. I just don't see my own typos, no matter how many times my eyes actually passes over the text. I'll integrate a checker in my workflow. Thanks, Ahmed