From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98DF62A8C1; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 18:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741458015; cv=none; b=Or1krsHr78BF/ENAQXcLxk93KoGm46qq3zVsQXJHZ4Kdb+U88+KC0yO2t1Zq6Et8RFXDjpP+5SJGLQijy7evjCv7XKSf3ASawUiV4BfwVwPu+pSL5vS6NS+kQokf63EOF0/G5aJgZlMDPBeQdUsD6KE+TRmQuSkJyT4tBhG6aoo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741458015; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2+idM9AajhMla8o4mCvYyhb7Yl5yACl9dS/uKmob9/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g9vSzqxaAJJFkiyckSTZajT9S/BONQJb68gXbv2HbSMf3NNOehVXlXjdJuFi6NbX81AtxVkKCh50U+CHsFThX6iZYGU1+OHqeZB5OF35StiSX8UjDbv001UhZGtfZNWx+xfN1gOB0SHLBAxsCxd+nULvecOFWXEXZ9O2jFYl2Ro= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Z9dLgQwZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Z9dLgQwZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5A9CC4CEE0; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 18:20:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741458015; bh=2+idM9AajhMla8o4mCvYyhb7Yl5yACl9dS/uKmob9/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z9dLgQwZQ+ZJtpKZ6ULB0jNd1NUgKcEkeSX2JwRDhG8Y4bQmTSEhfTSo6NEk4XBGQ syxF2rXZo29TTOutc97lOrGeDDaJ/40AldaoREwZhhIimlGUoHmuSHiqbMFbuAKCK8 C/HTHDo27wtOX3laFRPF618FNVm5YBASYCKbYYbxla8jOfHztO7r/LbGak8FjJX4Ri kVyReZIy8Eyqis7kl3GtMuParqAcjwe3255cYjfWsO09vS34muMqZJBFinlMbviRtB qnfnfq8vgC352xNXYGBiItztqhRteTNz7iPDeL+75T8HS5ri1guOwR5bUeFGu/yWMX /QajX5kytIbKg== Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 10:20:12 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Adrian Hunter , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ian Rogers , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Kan Liang , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [v2 1/2] perf report: Use map_symbol__copy() when copying call chains Message-ID: References: <20250307061250.320849-1-namhyung@kernel.org> <2719d1d0-6e1c-48fd-b73e-42b78c51b201@web.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > It's just two patches and they are independent. > > How do you think about to offer the desired changes as single items then > (without the context of a patch series in this case)? It could be. But they are loosely related as I found the issue during investigation of memory leaks so I sent them together. I think I added enough explanation in each commit. Thanks, Namhyung