From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931582F43; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741759504; cv=none; b=XAwe8eoYyHQcWpj7MS0oFxkr6xzGCSFMJTPisQ51oPwaqlsMkFWnPUX6hciIad/kB3+lNoiO/7gKkiMFe9MHeUWEq+AVFuU3SAvs++rK/rRWcE+23flVvb+X3Ooe76jRvyphCk/g9q5wdETT5M2y7lmhN6k4v7xwOw5ziTuwLGw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741759504; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tTPJy5dbtZoiQ5S+mA09sM3UbyaOYXFq6tULwTF/oms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CG3Pyu/Fi3uFM3y2I4rC/GPfAl4sCqHpa2jbn9L1h5AH7LT2hrv1e8wMI1oSHe2ZdfW9uymQHc1ol3ZGNX7l0zl4HLx05PeVCg8RCgj38hk93HW6xcw+fKFsL2jdd4c+qRFxSwCEgu5rDr+8xWz/WfZh228zDSiMVMfaI0/z7ZE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=H6nauwB5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="H6nauwB5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84FF3C4CEEB; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:05:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741759504; bh=tTPJy5dbtZoiQ5S+mA09sM3UbyaOYXFq6tULwTF/oms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=H6nauwB5Yh9QHZb0W+YCfce97rMcWUiBa9TdK1Z4jW1gK64sNnIdd4BGxql1UuXvT LhOnof7SZisXcApApmBmdHf4/9R0Mz4jXeThOp81Ovfm6f5cKQBMKOBVx0VYUhmgFw kfl3XKuVx5oBSM8mWKIEh8UcO9usW8jNsPVVywu7fbFD38PqrM09JqJoJMz2BZYVcr bH9q6st8AzDxfbT3IzP0uiHdOp0oW3/RMQZuM/73tC5UPi1S/BK2zq9LFavCUtgkeT ztyJIJLSnBOIApCSfZzxIAk6gh9h1dnNbeQc63r/RSkHzXbehq1tbWA+DvVNwbHkFK hB8sg2bKT08BQ== Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:05:00 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Stuart Yoder , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, peterhuewe@gmx.de, sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: Build error on -next due to tpm_crb.c changes? Message-ID: References: <20250305173611.74548-1-stuart.yoder@arm.com> <0ad035ff-400e-4b15-8b8f-40b69152ec46@leemhuis.info> <92bc0a65-608f-4307-bb1c-16d8836d42e5@arm.com> <77fb9077-f598-4308-8862-6d09b23688bb@leemhuis.info> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <77fb9077-f598-4308-8862-6d09b23688bb@leemhuis.info> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 05:51:17PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 11.03.25 16:53, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > On 3/11/25 10:21 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> On 05.03.25 18:36, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > [...] > > So, it should not be possible on one had have > > CONFIG_TCG_ARM_CRB_FFA being true when building tpm_crb.c > > and false resulting in the tpm_crb_ffa.o not being > > picked up in the build. > > Many thx for the answer. Maybe Fedora's way to prepare the .config files > (which my package builds use to be close to Fedora's official packages) > is doing something odd/wrong. Will take a closer look and report back. I don't have bandwidth for analysing the kconfig issue (except pointing out those obvious issues that I spotted). > Ciao, Thorsten BR, Jarkko