From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C761DF982; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741946895; cv=none; b=JpoIAy39FsZgs2LNZXsbG/0rqm4q4OSMPd/H59oXk3jXz5QSQ25sA5TTb3YsPVgsuS0BX3kZbRdLQA4A90gVP04wUnjHynYMefDHB9QOud554U8vRi+mKduBVnwUdG/DQgjb85R/jiCoH5GTDCbohCf4+m8NTG36KNm4el4TkQo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741946895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kn73f3ywP+3jWdjG+fmRIg/6UQjvehYiqYUuZrayPTk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VVyVvc/dd5SWMpJo2gDs607YPdsZunjNbKA8tZvJOdL2rxkexVwcRuw504ARJVazv1AUq03S2XsDC+WvKPBJXAfkwuy2UgFqXshudlP0eXZF2waImSHEk+eOg6iqnKWtulXZz8QX8qZWo0MUwbF9KwPnpyrovM32J28xr8hrdg8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FSDuHT2r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FSDuHT2r" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62E5CC4CEE3; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:08:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741946894; bh=kn73f3ywP+3jWdjG+fmRIg/6UQjvehYiqYUuZrayPTk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FSDuHT2rSHENWVA7r/jAjADzJ10rstTHCzMn1KPzMKAQ+FKZBmvh6PdEbleyxtISe 0DkGmBCEY/ms3RH0C4mUZVHi2d0QAa25MCeB6h89r8tgspTM0kmdOtgtKFzuTC9AGb Sb40ktifsFLotDSDapACdx16s7QJYRlcWSkOZSwb8ESXCSMYBtp5Cww1ARxHL6Hslb SBPaEn3KN22dXVVJY+iQ63RnG6+xaA7IlVWskgqbXHjUrNux+iNEzySlD8VL3aTXII YcCo9SeY8DRtIRtM8LwqO0j0WkgBsbP/K5gYIVl+cVWVNa0JoLVtgyCebfKwCUur9t LP1WAf/WzyarQ== Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:08:10 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Gro=DF?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Brian Gerst , Sohil Mehta , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Josh Poimboeuf , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip: x86/cpu] x86/xen: Move Xen upcall handler to Xen specific code files Message-ID: References: <20250313182236.655724-2-brgerst@gmail.com> <174194562029.14745.12496349660371729484.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: * Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 14.03.25 10:47, tip-bot2 for Brian Gerst wrote: > > The following commit has been merged into the x86/cpu branch of tip: > > > > Commit-ID: 827dc2e36172e978d6b1c701b04bee56881f54bf > > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/827dc2e36172e978d6b1c701b04bee56881f54bf > > Author: Brian Gerst > > AuthorDate: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:22:32 -04:00 > > Committer: Ingo Molnar > > CommitterDate: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:32:51 +01:00 > > > > x86/xen: Move Xen upcall handler to Xen specific code files > > > > Move the upcall handler to Xen-specific files. > > > > No functional changes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > > Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta > > Cc: Andy Lutomirski > > Cc: Juergen Gross > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin > > Cc: Linus Torvalds > > Cc: Josh Poimboeuf > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250313182236.655724-2-brgerst@gmail.com > > Why do I even request changes if such a request is being ignored? I missed your mail, sorry. > Please note that my request wasn't about something which should be > handled in a followup patch. I was asking to NOT move the code into > multiple files, but to keep it in one file as it was originally. I agree with you that this code looks better in enlighten_pv.c, but there's no reason to keep arch/x86/entry/common.c, agreed? I've rolled back these changes and will wait for -v2. Thanks, Ingo