From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>,
Joel Mathew Thomas <proxy0@tutamail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI/hotplug: Disable HPIE over reset
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 16:58:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9Wjk2GzrSURZoTG@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250313142333.5792-2-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> pciehp_reset_slot() disables PDCE (Presence Detect Changed Enable) and
> DLLSCE (Data Link Layer State Changed Enable) for the duration of reset
> and clears the related status bits PDC and DLLSC from the Slot Status
> register after the reset to avoid hotplug incorrectly assuming the card
> was removed.
>
> However, hotplug shares interrupt with PME and BW notifications both of
> which can make pciehp_isr() to run despite PDCE and DLLSCE bits being
> off. pciehp_isr() then picks PDC or DLLSC bits from the Slot Status
> register due to the events that occur during reset and caches them into
> ->pending_events. Later, the IRQ thread in pciehp_ist() will process
> the ->pending_events and will assume the Link went Down due to a card
> change (in pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change()).
>
> Change pciehp_reset_slot() to also clear HPIE (Hot-Plug Interrupt
> Enable) as pciehp_isr() will first check HPIE to see if the interrupt
> is not for it. Then synchronize with the IRQ handling to ensure no
> events are pending, before invoking the reset.
After dwelling on this for a while, I'm thinking that it may re-introduce
the issue fixed by commit f5eff5591b8f ("PCI: pciehp: Fix AB-BA deadlock
between reset_lock and device_lock"):
Looking at the second and third stack trace in its commit message,
down_write(reset_lock) in pciehp_reset_slot() is basically equivalent
to synchronize_irq() and we're holding device_lock() at that point,
hindering progress of pciehp_ist().
So I think I have guided you in the wrong direction and I apologize
for that.
However it seems to me that this should be solvable with the small
patch below. Am I missing something?
@Joel Mathew Thomas, could you give the below patch a spin and see
if it helps?
Thanks!
-- >8 --
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index bb5a8d9f03ad..99a2ac13a3d1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -688,6 +688,11 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+ /* Ignore events masked by pciehp_reset_slot(). */
+ events &= ctrl->slot_ctrl;
+ if (!events)
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+
/* Save pending events for consumption by IRQ thread. */
atomic_or(events, &ctrl->pending_events);
return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-15 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 14:23 [PATCH 0/4] PCI/hotplug: Fix interrupt / event handling problems Ilpo Järvinen
2025-03-13 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI/hotplug: Disable HPIE over reset Ilpo Järvinen
2025-03-15 15:58 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
[not found] ` <OLQ9qyD--F-9@tutamail.com>
2025-03-15 21:12 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-03-17 18:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-03-13 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI/hotplug: Clearing HPIE for the duration of reset is enough Ilpo Järvinen
2025-03-13 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI/hotplug: reset_lock is not required synchronizing with irq thread Ilpo Järvinen
2025-03-14 8:32 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-03-14 11:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-03-13 14:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI/hotplug: Don't enabled HPIE in poll mode Ilpo Järvinen
2025-03-15 11:57 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9Wjk2GzrSURZoTG@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=groeck@juniper.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=proxy0@tutamail.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rajatxjain@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox