From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, DanieleCleri@aaeon.eu,
GaryWang@aaeon.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/6] gpio: aggregator: export symbols of the gpio-fwd library
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:10:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9hXcr_GPhPt_gel@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317-aaeon-up-board-pinctrl-support-v2-3-36126e30aa62@bootlin.com>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 04:38:01PM +0100, Thomas Richard wrote:
> Export all symbols and create header file for the gpio-fwd library.
...
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/gpio-fwd.h>
Please, name it forwarder.h.
> #include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
...
> +int gpio_fwd_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> {
> struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>
> return gpiod_get_direction(fwd->descs[offset]);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_fwd_get_direction);
No namespace? Ditto for all exports.
> -static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
> - unsigned long *bits)
> +static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple_unlocked(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd,
> + unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
> {
> struct gpio_desc **descs = fwd_tmp_descs(fwd);
> unsigned long *values = fwd_tmp_values(fwd);
> @@ -332,8 +320,8 @@ static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple_locked(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> - unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
> +int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
> + unsigned long *bits)
> {
> struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -341,16 +329,17 @@ static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple_locked(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>
> if (chip->can_sleep) {
> mutex_lock(&fwd->mlock);
> - error = gpio_fwd_get_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
> + error = gpio_fwd_get_multiple_unlocked(fwd, mask, bits);
> mutex_unlock(&fwd->mlock);
> } else {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fwd->slock, flags);
> - error = gpio_fwd_get_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
> + error = gpio_fwd_get_multiple_unlocked(fwd, mask, bits);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fwd->slock, flags);
> }
>
> return error;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_fwd_get_multiple);
These two are nicely named. Instead of touching them, just simply add an
exported wrapper. We can optimize it latter if needed, but it reduces a lot
the churn in this patch.
...
> -static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
> - unsigned long *bits)
> +static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple_unlocked(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd,
> + unsigned long *mask,
> + unsigned long *bits)
> {
> struct gpio_desc **descs = fwd_tmp_descs(fwd);
> unsigned long *values = fwd_tmp_values(fwd);
> @@ -404,37 +395,40 @@ static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd, unsigned long *mask,
> gpiod_set_array_value(j, descs, NULL, values);
> }
>
> -static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple_locked(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> - unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
> +void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
> + unsigned long *bits)
> {
> struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> if (chip->can_sleep) {
> mutex_lock(&fwd->mlock);
> - gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
> + gpio_fwd_set_multiple_unlocked(fwd, mask, bits);
> mutex_unlock(&fwd->mlock);
> } else {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fwd->slock, flags);
> - gpio_fwd_set_multiple(fwd, mask, bits);
> + gpio_fwd_set_multiple_unlocked(fwd, mask, bits);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fwd->slock, flags);
> }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_fwd_set_multiple);
Ditto.
...
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __LINUX_GPIO_FWD_H
> +#define __LINUX_GPIO_FWD_H
This header uses something that is defined in other headers. Please follow IWYU
principle.
...
> +struct gpiochip_fwd_timing {
> + u32 ramp_up_us;
> + u32 ramp_down_us;
types.h
> +};
...
> +struct gpiochip_fwd {
> + struct device *dev;
struct device;
// forward declaration is enough.
> + struct gpio_chip chip;
Where is this being defined?
> + struct gpio_desc **descs;
> + union {
> + struct mutex mlock; /* protects tmp[] if can_sleep */
> + spinlock_t slock; /* protects tmp[] if !can_sleep */
And these?
> + };
> + struct gpiochip_fwd_timing *delay_timings;
> + unsigned long tmp[]; /* values and descs for multiple ops */
> +};
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 15:37 [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] Add pinctrl support for the AAEON UP board FPGA Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/6] gpiolib: add gpiochip_add_pin_range_sparse() function Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 16:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-09 13:49 ` Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/6] gpio: aggregator: refactor the forwarder part Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 17:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-17 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/6] gpio: aggregator: export symbols of the gpio-fwd library Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 17:10 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-03-17 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] gpio: aggregator: handle runtime registration of gpio_desc in gpiochip_fwd Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 17:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-09 14:50 ` Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] gpio: aggregator: add possibility to attach data to the forwarder Thomas Richard
2025-03-18 13:18 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-03-17 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] pinctrl: Add pin controller driver for AAEON UP boards Thomas Richard
2025-03-17 18:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-09 14:02 ` Thomas Richard
2025-04-15 8:39 ` Thomas Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9hXcr_GPhPt_gel@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=DanieleCleri@aaeon.eu \
--cc=GaryWang@aaeon.com.tw \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox