From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V6 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add quirk to bypass SCP fw bug
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:40:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9mUCmQW7L3yx7qt@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9l1L1WICMYXSoIu@pluto>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 01:29:19PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:16:36AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Have you made any progress on the quirk framework prototyping?
>
> I have not forgot, tried a few things, but nothing really to post as of
> now...dont wnat to rush either .... I was hoping to push something out at
> the end of this next merge window...
>
> > Do you need any input from Sibi on the protocol versioning for that?
>
> No I am fine, I am planning anyway for something generic enough to be
> easy then to plug your own quirks separately...
Sounds good, thanks.
> > We'd really like to enable cpufreq on this platform and ideally in 6.15.
> > I think that should be possible given that we now understand in what
> > ways the firmware is broken and what is needed to handle it even if we
> > still need to decide on how best to implement this.
>
> v6.15 seems hard/impossible even using the original Sibi patch
> given the usual upstreaming-timeline of the SCMI stack where everything has
> to be usually reviewed and accepted by rc4/rc5.....so both Sibi initial
> patch and my own babbling were alreaady sort of late.
Yes, sorry, I wasn't referring to Sibi's SCMI patches, but the
devicetree changes needed to enable cpufreq on these platforms (that
will go through the qcom tree).
It may be a little late for that too, but with an understanding of the
problem and a quirk implementation around the corner, we could enable
cpufreq as long as we make sure that Sibi's per-channel FC fix (that
addresses the FC warnings) is not merged without the quirk in place (to
avoid the crashes).
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 2:43 [RFC V6 0/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Misc Fixes Sibi Sankar
2025-02-26 2:43 ` [RFC V6 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Ensure that the message-id supports fastchannel Sibi Sankar
2025-02-26 2:43 ` [RFC V6 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add quirk to bypass SCP fw bug Sibi Sankar
2025-02-26 8:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-26 8:12 ` Johan Hovold
2025-02-26 8:55 ` Johan Hovold
2025-02-26 9:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-26 9:58 ` Johan Hovold
2025-02-27 8:34 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-03-03 10:53 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-18 8:16 ` Johan Hovold
2025-03-18 13:29 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-03-18 15:40 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-02-27 8:03 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9mUCmQW7L3yx7qt@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox