Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] bits: split the definition of the asm and non-asm GENMASK()

[Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 06:10:25PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 08/03/2025 at 02:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 01:48:48AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
> >> From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
> >>
> >> In an upcoming change, GENMASK() and its friends will indirectly
> >> depend on sizeof() which is not available in asm.
> >>
> >> Instead of adding further complexity to __GENMASK() to make it work
> >> for both asm and non asm, just split the definition of the two
> >> variants.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >> -/*
> >> - * BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO is not available in h files included from asm files,
> >> - * disable the input check if that is the case.
> >> - */
> > 
> >> +/*
> >> + * BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() is not available in h files included from asm files, so
> >> + * no input checks in assembly.
> >> + */
> > 
> > In case of a new version I would reformat this as
> > 
> > /*
> >  * BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() is not available in h files included from asm files,
> >  * so no input checks in assembly.
> >  */
> > 
> > It makes easier to review the changes and see that the first line is kept
> > the same.
> 
> Not fully convinced, but why not. I staged this change locally, it will
> be in v7.

I don't understand why this change is needed at all. The comment
states the same thing before and after, but the history gets wiped.
Maybe just don't touch it?