public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Kamel Bouhara" <kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Grégory Clement" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] input: misc: Add support for MAX7360 rotary
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:11:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9q0eaxhecN0kGKI@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318-mdb-max7360-support-v5-10-fb20baf97da0@bootlin.com>

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 05:26:26PM +0100, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> Add driver for Maxim Integrated MAX7360 rotary encoder controller,
> supporting a single rotary switch.

...

> +	help
> +	  If you say yes here you get support for the rotary encoder on the
> +	  Maxim MAX7360 I/O Expander.
> +
> +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> +	  module will be called max7360_rotary.

Seems all your patches have unaligned line widths in the help texts.

...

+ bitfield.h
+ device/devres.h
+ dev_printk.h

> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/max7360.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>

> +#include <linux/of.h>

Why?

> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>

> +#include <linux/slab.h>

Not needed.

+ types.h

...

> +static irqreturn_t max7360_rotary_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct max7360_rotary *max7360_rotary = data;
> +	int val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(max7360_rotary->regmap, MAX7360_REG_RTR_CNT, &val);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&max7360_rotary->input->dev,
> +			"Failed to read rotary counter\n");
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (val == 0) {
> +		dev_dbg(&max7360_rotary->input->dev,
> +			"Got a spurious interrupt\n");
> +
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +	}
> +
> +	input_report_rel(max7360_rotary->input, max7360_rotary->axis,
> +			 (int8_t)val);

This is strange:
1) why casting to begin with?
2) why to C type and not kernel (s8) type?

> +	input_sync(max7360_rotary->input);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

...

> +static int max7360_rotary_hw_init(struct max7360_rotary *max7360_rotary)
> +{
> +	int val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	val = FIELD_PREP(MAX7360_ROT_DEBOUNCE, max7360_rotary->debounce_ms) |
> +		FIELD_PREP(MAX7360_ROT_INTCNT, 1) | MAX7360_ROT_INTCNT_DLY;
> +	ret = regmap_write(max7360_rotary->regmap, MAX7360_REG_RTRCFG, val);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&max7360_rotary->input->dev,
> +			"Failed to set max7360 rotary encoder configuration\n");

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;

Just

	return ret;

?

> +}

...

> +static int max7360_rotary_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct max7360_rotary *max7360_rotary;

	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;

> +	struct input_dev *input;
> +	int irq;
> +	int ret;

> +	if (!pdev->dev.parent)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV, "No parent device\n");

Just check for regmap.

> +	irq = platform_get_irq_byname(to_platform_device(pdev->dev.parent),
> +				      "inti");

One line (and instead of that dance with container_of(), just use
fwnode_irq_get_byname().

> +	if (irq < 0)
> +		return irq;
> +
> +	max7360_rotary = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*max7360_rotary),
> +				      GFP_KERNEL);

One line.

> +	if (!max7360_rotary)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	max7360_rotary->regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
> +	if (!max7360_rotary->regmap)

> +		dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV,
> +			      "Could not get parent regmap\n");

One line.

> +	device_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.parent, "linux,axis",
> +				 &max7360_rotary->axis);
> +	device_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.parent, "rotary-debounce-delay-ms",
> +				 &max7360_rotary->debounce_ms);

No, instead of parent, make sure that fwnode is propagated to the children (and
tadaam, it's done in MFD already).

> +	if (max7360_rotary->debounce_ms > MAX7360_ROT_DEBOUNCE_MAX)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL,
> +				     "Invalid debounce timing: %u\n",
> +				     max7360_rotary->debounce_ms);
> +
> +	input = devm_input_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!input)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	max7360_rotary->input = input;
> +
> +	input->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
> +	input->name = pdev->name;
> +	input->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> +
> +	input_set_capability(input, EV_REL, max7360_rotary->axis);
> +	input_set_drvdata(input, max7360_rotary);
> +
> +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
> +					max7360_rotary_irq,

> +					IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,

What's wrong with the firmware description of the interrupt?

> +					"max7360-rotary", max7360_rotary);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> +				     "Failed to register interrupt\n");
> +
> +	ret = input_register_device(input);
> +	if (ret)

> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> +				     "Could not register input device\n");

One line.

> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, max7360_rotary);

Is it used?

> +	device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true);
> +	ret = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(&pdev->dev, irq);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set up wakeup irq: %d\n", ret);
> +
> +	ret = max7360_rotary_hw_init(max7360_rotary);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> +				     "Failed to initialize max7360 rotary\n");

In the other driver the HW initialisation and wake setup were swapped,
can you choose one way? Otherwise both cases need a comment to explain
the order of calls.

> +	return 0;
> +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18 16:26 [PATCH v5 00/11] Add support for MAX7360 Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] dt-bindings: mfd: gpio: Add MAX7360 Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-18 17:39   ` Rob Herring
2025-03-19 16:43     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-31  8:47   ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] mfd: Add max7360 support mathieu.dubois-briand
2025-03-19 11:10   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25 16:26     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-25 16:40       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] pinctrl: Add MAX7360 pinctrl driver Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-19 11:13   ` Linus Walleij
2025-03-19 11:35   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] pwm: max7360: Add MAX7360 PWM support mathieu.dubois-briand
2025-03-19 11:18   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-20  7:50     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-03-20 10:48       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25 14:37         ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-25 15:56           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-26 14:44             ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-26 15:49               ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-26 17:46                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-03-27  9:30                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-27 14:28                 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-27 17:50                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-28  8:13                     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-28 12:35                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25 14:29     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-25 15:41       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-19 12:57   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-20  2:25   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] regmap: irq: Add support for chips without separate IRQ status Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-18 16:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-20  8:45     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-20 11:00       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] gpio: regmap: Allow to allocate regmap-irq device Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-18 16:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-20  7:55     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-20 10:50       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-19  7:15   ` Michael Walle
2025-03-20  8:35     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-20 10:55       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25  8:03         ` Michael Walle
2025-03-25  7:50       ` Michael Walle
2025-03-26 11:00         ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-28  9:23           ` Michael Walle
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] gpio: regmap: Allow to provide init_valid_mask callback Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-18 16:53   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-20  8:48     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-19  7:02   ` Michael Walle
2025-03-20  8:49     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] gpio: max7360: Add MAX7360 gpio support Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-19 11:50   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25 14:46     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-25 15:57       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-19 14:12   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-19 22:34   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] input: keyboard: Add support for MAX7360 keypad Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-19 12:02   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-25 14:57     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-25 15:58       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-19 15:15   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] input: misc: Add support for MAX7360 rotary Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-19 12:11   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-03-25 15:56     ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-25 16:11       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-19 16:31   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-20  0:29   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] MAINTAINERS: Add entry on MAX7360 driver Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-03-19 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Add support for MAX7360 Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9q0eaxhecN0kGKI@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox