From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2C41F4C8F; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742404417; cv=none; b=AVNrNquRiSevD3OsqEu/nxR23Wnb/XwUjNZeClfxeS6gSwytGC4bEfQpMeiWOYxEuKlmKZRuGj6YteWG5MGRuk+QALQyNulcMAFayph6SqCOhh0mwKw0nO5yxsUl0LObd48YUDoffQI6bdM0MlLQHj1F5RoGNbH5e9tvpiM8xig= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742404417; c=relaxed/simple; bh=30oTOjJkUh8xHQT9ze5OgXmT+0f3Fe1IsJfzjTzic7s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KseWjoe4JF4dbDQ0DrZNv+Z8ZvIBcoQX0zNFNR1SHcwf8xFyQIuH5RXbyAe3DbK1j5JrTb1WNvVO6khaqtYHDp7uqQhcRab+7tRn1SYIw4h8L6H+9NieppSaIRRmfZk8WOF+hNGQ0V/qqH4fQgwdaDFiE35R34+ZfqBSSUfn4GE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b=V9hZbCuI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="V9hZbCuI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2540C4CEE9; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="V9hZbCuI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1742404414; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ezPW8Ofll5jcvPOM6XGPTr1u1TQa1b4BIgp62sYV2Oo=; b=V9hZbCuIKbNh2yo4Rio59GzMwMrTXLGYBYQenS3/BjJcent7rcxiADyKHRY1TBhfNbN4xD lQvl3aDfhRCsnB87O19jWcftG8jD09Nx5fK7wQsxNQth0OO/Jps3aZEpX5VniaiGSr56xl BmZM3I+d4zomsVUol/OMthurcaTEUYU= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 1495fefb (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:13:29 +0100 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: Andi Shyti Cc: Markus Theil , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/selftests: use prandom in selftest Message-ID: References: <20250211063332.16542-1-theil.markus@gmail.com> <20250211063332.16542-2-theil.markus@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Andi, On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:19:12PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Markus, > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Markus Theil wrote: > > This is part of a prandom cleanup, which removes > > next_pseudo_random32 and replaces it with the standard PRNG. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Theil > > I merged just this patch in drm-intel-gt-next. This is minorly annoying for me... What am I supposed to do with patches 2 and 3? Take them through my tree for 6.16 in like half a year? Can I just take the v1 into my tree and we can get this done with straight forwardly? Or do you have a different suggestion for me? Jason