From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sched: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG features unconditional
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 22:09:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9syncxlUbb_oj4Q@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xhsmh4izppfqw.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
* Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 17/03/25 11:42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > For more than a decade, CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y has been enabled
> > in all the major Linux distributions:
> >
> > /boot/config-6.11.0-19-generic:CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
> >
> > The reason is that while originally CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG started
> > out as a debugging feature, over the years (decades ...) it has
> > grown various bits of statistics, instrumentation and
> > control knobs that are useful for sysadmin and general software
> > development purposes as well.
> >
> > But within the kernel we still pretend that there's a choice,
> > and sometimes code that is seemingly 'debug only' creates overhead
> > that should be optimized in reality.
> >
> > So make it all official and make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG unconditional.
> > This gets rid of a large amount of #ifdefs, so good riddance ...
> >
>
> Pretty much every distro I'm aware of has CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y; a quick check
> tells me it's been like so for RHEL since at least 2013, and that's from a
> commit copying configs from RHEL-6 to RHEL-7.
>
> Two things however come to mind:
>
> 1) What does this mean for the debug stuff we've repeatedly said wasn't ABI
> because it was under CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG? I've been burned by making
> sched_domain.flags read-only, and there's still writable stuff:
>
> # ls -al /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu0/domain0/
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 .
> drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 ..
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 busy_factor
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 cache_nice_tries
> -r--r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 flags
> -r--r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 groups_flags
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 imbalance_pct
> -r--r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 level
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 max_interval
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 max_newidle_lb_cost
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 min_interval
> -r--r--r--. 1 root root 0 Mar 19 04:36 name
>
> + all the non topology related debug knobs.
Yeah, I don't think these or other sysctls are as contentious as
previously thought. We might want to put '/debug/' into the directory
name above, or we could move it over to debugfs entirely - but we
should make it clear via the name that these are debugging knobs in
essence.
> 2) Peter mentioned a few times that, last time it was benchmarked, there
> were noticeable perf differences between CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=n and
> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y. This would be an occasion to re-measure that and
> potentially move (some of) these checks to e.g. a sched_debug_verbose
> static key.
Yeah, and this is an argument strongly *in favor* of eliminating
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG: in a way the CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG "option" created a
false sense of "it's only debug code". But it's not a genuine debug
option, it's actual overhead for the vast majority of Linux distros and
users.
So let's just eliminate SCHED_DEBUG, and fix any overhead. It's exactly
what we should do anyway - nothing changes IMHO, just the appearance of
urgency. :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 10:42 [PATCH 0/5] sched: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG features unconditional Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/debug: Change SCHED_WARN_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-24 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-25 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 11:18 ` [PATCH] bug: Introduce CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_EXTRA=y to also log warning conditions Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-25 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-25 18:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-25 22:42 ` [PATCH] bug: Add the condition string to the CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y output Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-26 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/debug: Make 'const_debug' tunables unconditional __read_mostly Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/debug: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG functionality unconditional Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/debug, Documentation: Remove (most) CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG references from documentation Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/debug: Remove CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 8:59 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-24 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] sched: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG features unconditional Linus Torvalds
2025-03-17 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-19 8:49 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-19 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-03-19 12:48 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-19 21:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 4:41 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/debug: Remove CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG from self-test config files tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9syncxlUbb_oj4Q@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).