public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/setup: Always reserve the first 1M of RAM
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:10:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAG5fvRl4Z+3vGfS@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d344756-aec4-4df2-9427-da742ef9ce6b@app.fastmail.com>

Hi Andy,

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 07:51:43PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021, at 11:01 AM, tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > x86/setup: Always reserve the first 1M of RAM
> >

...

> +       /*
> +        * Unconditionally reserve the entire fisrt 1M, see comment in
> +        * setup_arch().
> +        */
> +       memblock_reserve(0, SZ_1M);
> 
> 
> But this runs even if we just failed to allocate a trampoline on the
> first try, again dooming the kernel to panic.
> 
> I real the commit message and the linked bug, and I'm having trouble
> finding evidence of anything actually fixed by this patch.  Can we just
> revert it?  If not, it would be nice to get a fixup patch that genuinely
> cleans this up -- the whole structure of the code (first, try to allocate
> trampoline, then free boot services, then try again) isn't really
> conducive to a model where we *don't* free boot services < 1M.
 
Currently, the second attempt to set_real_mode_mem() in
efi_free_boot_services() does not allocate from memblock anyway but reuses
memory freed from EFI services. Could be that failure to boot caused by
another failing reservation?
 
> Discovered by my delightful laptop, which does not boot with this patch applied.

Do you have early_printk() visible? 
 
> --Andy

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-03  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01  7:53 [PATCH 0/3] x86/setup: always resrve the first 1M of RAM Mike Rapoport
2021-06-01  7:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/setup: always reserve " Mike Rapoport
2021-06-01  9:06   ` Baoquan He
2021-06-01 17:19     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-03 17:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-03 18:01   ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/setup: Always " tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport
2023-03-02  3:51     ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-03-02 10:50       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-02 15:06         ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-03-02 15:22           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-02 16:59       ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-03-03  9:10       ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2023-03-07  0:33         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-07-01 17:15   ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/setup: always " Dave Hansen
2021-07-01 19:45     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-06-01  7:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/setup: remove CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW and reservelow options Mike Rapoport
2021-06-07 12:22   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/setup: Remove CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW and reservelow= options tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport
2021-06-01  7:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/crash: remove crash_reserve_low_1M() Mike Rapoport
2021-06-07 12:22   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/crash: Remove crash_reserve_low_1M() tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport
2021-06-01 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86/setup: always resrve the first 1M of RAM Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZAG5fvRl4Z+3vGfS@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox