[PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Fix typo nr_cpumask_size --> nr_cpumask_bits

[PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Fix typo nr_cpumask_size --> nr_cpumask_bits

[Andy Shevchenko]

I think the never used nr_cpumask_size is just a typo,
hence use existing redefinition that's called nr_cpumask_bits.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 8fbe76607965..ce8eb7ef2107 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr)
  *
  * Finally, some operations just want the exact limit, either because
  * they set bits or just don't have any faster fixed-sized versions. We
- * call this just 'nr_cpumask_size'.
+ * call this just 'nr_cpumask_bits'.
  *
  * Note that these optional constants are always guaranteed to be at
  * least as big as 'nr_cpu_ids' itself is, and all our cpumask
-- 
2.39.1

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Fix typo nr_cpumask_size --> nr_cpumask_bits

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:22:04PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> I think the never used nr_cpumask_size is just a typo,
> hence use existing redefinition that's called nr_cpumask_bits.

In another thread we still mention this. Interesting...
what did I miss?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Fix typo nr_cpumask_size --> nr_cpumask_bits

[Linus Torvalds]

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 11:49 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> In another thread we still mention this. Interesting...
> what did I miss?

You didn't miss anything, your typo fix is correct, and the same typo
just exists in that other thread too. For all the same reasons for the
original typo (possibly together with some cut-and-paste from said
comment).

         Linus