From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Takahiro Itazuri <itazur@amazon.com>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org,
zulinx86@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Propagate AMD-specific IBRS bits to guests
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 13:16:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAZYKe4L8jhMG4An@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/6FIeJ5KCOfKEPN@zn.tnic>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:24:16PM +0000, Takahiro Itazuri wrote:
> > I'm still a kernel newbie and I don't have a strong opinion for that.
> > I just thought it would be helpful if the KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID API
> > returns the same security information as the host, as long as it is
> > harmless.
>
> Not harmless - cpufeatures.h should contain flags which the kernel uses
> and not *every* CPUID bit out there.
I thought that the consensus was that adding unused-by-the-kernel flags to
cpufeatures.h is ok so long as the feature is hidden from /proc/cpuinfo and the
kernel already dedicates a word to the CPUID leaf?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-27 21:05 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Propagate AMD-specific IBRS bits to guests Takahiro Itazuri
2023-02-27 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD-specific IBRS bits Takahiro Itazuri
2023-02-27 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Propagate AMD-specific IBRS related bits Takahiro Itazuri
2023-02-27 21:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Propagate AMD-specific IBRS bits to guests Borislav Petkov
2023-02-28 18:13 ` Takahiro Itazuri
2023-02-28 19:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-28 19:41 ` Takahiro Itazuri
2023-02-28 20:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-28 22:24 ` Takahiro Itazuri
2023-02-28 22:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-06 21:16 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-03-06 21:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-06 21:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-06 21:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-06 21:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-07 18:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-07 18:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-07 19:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-07 19:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-06 21:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZAZYKe4L8jhMG4An@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=itazur@amazon.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zulinx86@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox