Re: [PATCH 2/6] gpio: twl4030: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data() to simplify remove path

[Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 10:54:28AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Use devm version of gpiochip add function to handle removal for us.

I do not see this change in the below code.
Can you shed a light?

> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c | 16 ----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c
> index c1bb2c3ca6f2..23f58bf3a415 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c
> @@ -492,18 +492,6 @@ static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *of_gpio_twl4030(struct device *dev,
>  	return omap_twl_info;
>  }
>  
> -/* Cannot use as gpio_twl4030_probe() calls us */
> -static int gpio_twl4030_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> -	struct gpio_twl4030_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -
> -	gpiochip_remove(&priv->gpio_chip);
> -
> -	/* REVISIT no support yet for deregistering all the IRQs */
> -	WARN_ON(!is_module());
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static int gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -581,12 +569,9 @@ static int gpio_twl4030_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
>  		priv->gpio_chip.ngpio = 0;
> -		gpio_twl4030_remove(pdev);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> -
>  	if (pdata->setup) {
>  		int status;
>  
> @@ -615,7 +600,6 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_twl4030_driver = {
>  		.of_match_table = twl_gpio_match,
>  	},
>  	.probe		= gpio_twl4030_probe,
> -	.remove		= gpio_twl4030_remove,
>  };
>  
>  static int __init gpio_twl4030_init(void)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko