Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>]

Hi Abel,

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 05:58:31PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> As both SDCC and UFS drivers use the ICE with duplicated implementation,
> while none of the currently supported platforms make use concomitantly
> of the same ICE IP block instance, the new SM8550 allows both UFS and
> SDCC to do so. In order to support such scenario, there is a need for
> a unified implementation and a devicetree node to be shared between
> both types of storage devices. So lets drop the duplicate implementation
> of the ICE from both SDCC and UFS and make it a dedicated (soc) driver.
> Also, switch all UFS and SDCC devicetree nodes to use the new ICE
> approach.
> 
> See each individual patch for changelogs.
> 
> The v1 is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230214120253.1098426-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
> 
> Abel Vesa (7):
>   dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Add schema for Inline Crypto Engine
>   dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle and drop core clock
>   dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add ICE phandle and drop core clock
>   soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver
>   scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: Switch to the new ICE API
>   arm64: dts: qcom: Add the Inline Crypto Engine nodes

Does this address all the comments on v1?  I had also asked some questions on
v1.  It would be helpful if you would respond.

- Eric