From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Fix msan issue in lock_contention_read()
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:54:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZB3/52fEm7/5w72q@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWPDSy31BLtxvJAsRq2pwnhKHN8T-CYckv=tELGCO9p0w@mail.gmail.com>
Em Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:50:57PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 5:19 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I got a report of a msan failure like below:
> >
> > $ sudo perf lock con -ab -- sleep 1
> > ...
> > ==224416==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
> > #0 0x5651160d6c96 in lock_contention_read util/bpf_lock_contention.c:290:8
> > #1 0x565115f90870 in __cmd_contention builtin-lock.c:1919:3
> > #2 0x565115f90870 in cmd_lock builtin-lock.c:2385:8
> > #3 0x565115f03a83 in run_builtin perf.c:330:11
> > #4 0x565115f03756 in handle_internal_command perf.c:384:8
> > #5 0x565115f02d53 in run_argv perf.c:428:2
> > #6 0x565115f02d53 in main perf.c:562:3
> > #7 0x7f43553bc632 in __libc_start_main
> > #8 0x565115e865a9 in _start
> >
> > It was because the 'key' variable is not initialized. Actually it'd be set
> > by bpf_map_get_next_key() but msan didn't seem to understand it. Let's make
> > msan happy by initializing the variable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c
> > index 235fc7150545..5927bf0bd92b 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c
> > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static const char *lock_contention_get_name(struct lock_contention *con,
> > int lock_contention_read(struct lock_contention *con)
> > {
> > int fd, stack, err = 0;
> > - struct contention_key *prev_key, key;
> > + struct contention_key *prev_key, key = {};
> > struct contention_data data = {};
> > struct lock_stat *st = NULL;
> > struct machine *machine = con->machine;
> > --
> > 2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog
> >
--
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 0:19 [PATCH] perf lock contention: Fix msan issue in lock_contention_read() Namhyung Kim
2023-03-24 6:50 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-24 19:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZB3/52fEm7/5w72q@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox