[PATCH] mm/gup.c: fix typo in comments

[PATCH] mm/gup.c: fix typo in comments

[Jingyu Wang]

Signed-off-by: Jingyu Wang <jingyuwang_vip@163.com>
---
 mm/gup.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index eab18ba045db..1f72a717232b 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ static bool is_valid_gup_args(struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas,
  * This does not guarantee that the page exists in the user mappings when
  * get_user_pages_remote returns, and there may even be a completely different
  * page there in some cases (eg. if mmapped pagecache has been invalidated
- * and subsequently re faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
+ * and subsequently re-faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
  * won't be freed completely. And mostly callers simply care that the page
  * contains data that was valid *at some point in time*. Typically, an IO
  * or similar operation cannot guarantee anything stronger anyway because
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] mm/gup.c: fix typo in comments

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 425 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 06:48:13PM +0800, Jingyu Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jingyu Wang <jingyuwang_vip@163.com>

What? No description, really? And Fixes: what?

> - * and subsequently re faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
> + * and subsequently re-faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
Or refaulted?

I'm kinda confused...

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]