From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Daniel Díaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/39] 4.19.278-rc1 review
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:47:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBLJmakn42oYUSdd@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e46d536-cc68-4b7c-e56e-cf1b94a925cb@linaro.org>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 09:44:59AM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 15/03/23 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.278 release.
> > There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:57:10 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.278-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Lots and lots of failures, mostly Arm.
>
> For Arm, Arm64, MIPS, with GCC-8, GCC-9, GCC-10, GCC-11, GCC-12, Clang-16, for some combinations with:
> * axm55xx_defconfig
> * davinci_all_defconfig
> * defconfig
> * defconfig-40bc7ee5
> * lkftconfig-kasan
> * multi_v5_defconfig
> * s5pv210_defconfig
> * sama5_defconfig
>
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2237:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_online_cpus' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> get_online_cpus();
> ^
> /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2237:2: note: did you mean 'get_online_mems'?
> /builds/linux/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:258:20: note: 'get_online_mems' declared here
> static inline void get_online_mems(void) {}
> ^
> /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2248:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_online_cpus' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> put_online_cpus();
> ^
> /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2248:2: note: did you mean 'put_online_mems'?
> /builds/linux/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:259:20: note: 'put_online_mems' declared here
> static inline void put_online_mems(void) {}
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
> make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:303: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o] Error 1
> ----->8-----
This should now be resolved, I'll do a -rc2 with the fixes.
> For Arm64, i386 x86, with GCC-11, Perf has a new error:
>
> -----8<-----
> In function 'ready',
> inlined from 'sender' at bench/sched-messaging.c:90:2:
> bench/sched-messaging.c:76:13: error: 'dummy' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]
> 76 | if (write(ready_out, &dummy, 1) != 1)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from bench/../perf-sys.h:5,
> from bench/../perf.h:18,
> from bench/sched-messaging.c:13:
> ----->8-----
That's odd as I don't see any perf patches for 4.19.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-16 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-15 12:12 [PATCH 4.19 00/39] 4.19.278-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-15 14:12 ` Chris Paterson
2023-03-15 14:24 ` Chris Paterson
2023-03-16 7:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-15 14:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-15 15:44 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-03-15 15:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-15 16:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-15 16:28 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-03-16 7:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-16 7:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-03-16 0:04 ` Shuah Khan
2023-03-16 8:51 ` Missing patches in 4.19? was " Pavel Machek
2023-03-16 9:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZBLJmakn42oYUSdd@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox