From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DB9C6FD1C for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 18:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230141AbjCVSGT (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:06:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45720 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229484AbjCVSGO (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:06:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 182565F511 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id m6-20020a05600c3b0600b003ee6e324b19so1278164wms.1 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:06:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679508370; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lQlkTrDUMyIzoKUTa4EB/7B9v75JQsqp1RH/FF8jnII=; b=Jv/yvvCIK9N/w4adbeYydlyMQukdDjPsjhHiWZML0YgwHCbjb3oWOXkMDFxGyqMis8 Y9heDgxww1MEfpFHUHbwP0+f5jLcaW+lya3SGPkHXFDVCkSUmtPUWislMayCeqMO30XH lhtp92ZYe8zWEcMgnIa7he4GgyY0BNZlnTviZo+Mx/QgMI5nOlfPk3RQ5+Krm1+xz2p5 KNChmEF2+Z2rtzSv1qxpfsv1gjGaZN+4SRWEJG/Tjqy54RjC5lPCIbFdaVrhhFyWn8Jz Seel55pLxPkZwgva2ld/t+h7CzF9tf24k1sfrvuLA+0jSGj16Z0X6bhLzfzOkV8PvCW1 VxTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679508370; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lQlkTrDUMyIzoKUTa4EB/7B9v75JQsqp1RH/FF8jnII=; b=fLjN3oyGGwwFbI5H/r+Zszw2Wrx6qkrVxvUbep68KD9UcuqYPG3rvPfcQISnMF9fKo ab5pZO4g9yHjh6D84ZY1h5w96CL9Fn+u8AnZZIpf1RQ29YHc4YiQRXEdMp/vCCzmvezt j3iBYkq/CbxIgdlXFGhYx6qVspRASC+YT3oh0gsgxsG+RWI0vLGBY+F9c5miSTWJQVoT /89kgM9d3aKsPjKRgqZTOuTO63InXaqfVy7v/LQrfumveO47l3QmOOnnbXwy2Oqm3jWD ilDOxxWV4UzVarKTM/HZ3Ox5F4Svq1GwtDPrbKqkB3Nvg5gVS9g3Z5SN/7f5xNgMRzc2 uMWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXlgR7JvjKgbig+ANanulOd80hRi01EbUD2cKzKhvl5/OaroKG/ DRJ3ei/5VcMgzudRj0pU0rv9MPmYA+NrxrvS X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9PvLALfTOZlyrn4wUsytwFilchVUKkUSnU6OXEoe2fBm9qiDZfKWrdnLEWV8TmcajiZO9Urw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3d9:0:b0:3ee:42fd:7768 with SMTP id t25-20020a7bc3d9000000b003ee42fd7768mr372051wmj.1.1679508370151; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khadija-virtual-machine ([39.41.14.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10-20020a5d464a000000b002cea8f07813sm14452324wrs.81.2023.03.22.11.06.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 23:06:07 +0500 From: Khadija Kamran To: Dan Carpenter Cc: outreachy@lists.linux.dev, Parthiban Veerasooran , Christian Gromm , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: most: fix line ending with '(' Message-ID: References: <8064a4ee-665b-417e-a1e2-7e7dd32ec1f0@kili.mountain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8064a4ee-665b-417e-a1e2-7e7dd32ec1f0@kili.mountain> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 06:09:50PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 08:01:52PM +0500, Khadija Kamran wrote: > > Splitting function header to multiple lines because of 80 characters per > > line limit, results in ending the function call line with '('. > > This leads to CHECK reported by checkpatch.pl > > > > Move the function parameters right after the '(' in the function call > > line. Align the rest of the parameters to the opening parenthesis. > > > > Signed-off-by: Khadija Kamran > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Changed the description > > > > No one replied to the v1 of this patch so it's not clear which of the > patches should be ignored. > Hey Dan! I created a patch revision without any feedback. My bad. I thought the description in the previous patch was misleading, so I wanted to change it. > Also you have a couple patches with the same subject and that's against > the rules. > I am sorry about that. Kindly guide me here. Both patches are for same driver i.e. staging/most, but for different files. Would it be fine to add file names in the subject to differentiate them? Regards, Khadija > regards, > dan carpenter >