Re: [PATCH] PM: hibernate: Do not get block device exclusively in test_resume mode

Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-04-05T18:37:49Z

On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 10:59 AM Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The system refused to do a test_resume because it found that the
> swap device has already been taken by someone else. Specificly,
> the swsusp_check()->blkdev_get_by_dev(FMODE_EXCL) is supposed to
> do this check.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/swapfile bs=$(cat /proc/meminfo |
> awk '/MemTotal/ {print $2}') count=1024 conv=notrunc
> mkswap /swapfile
> swapon /swapfile
> swap-offset /swapfile
> echo 34816 > /sys/power/resume_offset
> echo test_resume > /sys/power/disk
> echo disk > /sys/power/state
>
> PM: Using 3 thread(s) for compression
> PM: Compressing and saving image data (293150 pages)...
> PM: Image saving progress: 0%
> PM: Image saving progress: 10%
> ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
> ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> PM: Image saving progress: 20%
> PM: Image saving progress: 30%
> PM: Image saving progress: 40%
> PM: Image saving progress: 50%
> pcieport 0000:00:02.5: pciehp: Slot(0-5): No device found
> PM: Image saving progress: 60%
> PM: Image saving progress: 70%
> PM: Image saving progress: 80%
> PM: Image saving progress: 90%
> PM: Image saving done
> PM: hibernation: Wrote 1172600 kbytes in 2.70 seconds (434.29 MB/s)
> PM: S|
> PM: hibernation: Basic memory bitmaps freed
> PM: Image not found (code -16)
>
> This is because when using the swapfile as the hibernation storage,
> the block device where the swapfile is located has already been mounted
> by the OS distribution(usually been mounted as the rootfs). This is not
> an issue for normal hibernation, because software_resume()->swsusp_check()
> happens before the block device(rootfs) mount. But it is a problem for the
> test_resume mode. Because when test_resume happens, the block device has
> been mounted already.
>
> Thus remove the FMODE_EXCL for test_resume mode. This would not be a
> problem because in test_resume stage, the processes have already been
> frozen, and the race condition described in
> Commit 39fbef4b0f77 ("PM: hibernate: Get block device exclusively in swsusp_check()")
> is unlikely to happen.
>
> Fixes: 39fbef4b0f77 ("PM: hibernate: Get block device exclusively in swsusp_check()")
> Reported-by: Yifan Li <yifan2.li@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/power/hibernate.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> kernel/power/power.h | 2 +-
> kernel/power/swap.c | 10 +++++++---
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> index 793c55a2becb..f50456e72f0a 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> @@ -683,22 +683,26 @@ static void power_down(void)
> cpu_relax();
> }
>
> -static int load_image_and_restore(void)
> +static int load_image_and_restore(bool safe)

It is not very clear why the argument is called "safe".

Either this needs to be explained in a comment, or I would just call
it "exclusive" and rework the checks accordingly.

> {
> + fmode_t mode = FMODE_READ;
> int error;
> unsigned int flags;
>
> pm_pr_dbg("Loading hibernation image.\n");
>
> + if (!safe)
> + mode |= FMODE_EXCL;
> +
> lock_device_hotplug();
> error = create_basic_memory_bitmaps();
> if (error) {
> - swsusp_close(FMODE_READ | FMODE_EXCL);
> + swsusp_close(mode);
> goto Unlock;
> }
>
> error = swsusp_read(&flags);
> - swsusp_close(FMODE_READ | FMODE_EXCL);
> + swsusp_close(mode);
> if (!error)
> error = hibernation_restore(flags & SF_PLATFORM_MODE);
>
> @@ -785,9 +789,9 @@ int hibernate(void)
> unlock_device_hotplug();
> if (snapshot_test) {
> pm_pr_dbg("Checking hibernation image\n");
> - error = swsusp_check();
> + error = swsusp_check(true);
> if (!error)
> - error = load_image_and_restore();
> + error = load_image_and_restore(true);
> }
> thaw_processes();
>
> @@ -983,7 +987,7 @@ static int software_resume(void)
> MAJOR(swsusp_resume_device), MINOR(swsusp_resume_device));
>
> pm_pr_dbg("Looking for hibernation image.\n");
> - error = swsusp_check();
> + error = swsusp_check(false);
> if (error)
> goto Unlock;
>
> @@ -1011,7 +1015,7 @@ static int software_resume(void)
> goto Close_Finish;
> }
>
> - error = load_image_and_restore();
> + error = load_image_and_restore(false);
> thaw_processes();
> Finish:
> pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_POST_RESTORE);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/power.h b/kernel/power/power.h
> index b4f433943209..66a7595ad3e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/power.h
> +++ b/kernel/power/power.h
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ extern int swsusp_swap_in_use(void);
> #define SF_HW_SIG 8
>
> /* kernel/power/hibernate.c */
> -extern int swsusp_check(void);
> +extern int swsusp_check(bool safe);
> extern void swsusp_free(void);
> extern int swsusp_read(unsigned int *flags_p);
> extern int swsusp_write(unsigned int flags);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/swap.c b/kernel/power/swap.c
> index 36a1df48280c..1be0257da8ab 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/swap.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/swap.c
> @@ -1514,13 +1514,17 @@ int swsusp_read(unsigned int *flags_p)
> * swsusp_check - Check for swsusp signature in the resume device
> */
>
> -int swsusp_check(void)
> +int swsusp_check(bool safe)

An analogous comment applies here.

> {
> + fmode_t mode = FMODE_READ;
> int error;
> void *holder;
>
> + if (!safe)
> + mode |= FMODE_EXCL;
> +
> hib_resume_bdev = blkdev_get_by_dev(swsusp_resume_device,
> - FMODE_READ | FMODE_EXCL, &holder);
> + mode, &holder);
> if (!IS_ERR(hib_resume_bdev)) {
> set_blocksize(hib_resume_bdev, PAGE_SIZE);
> clear_page(swsusp_header);
> @@ -1547,7 +1551,7 @@ int swsusp_check(void)
>
> put:
> if (error)
> - blkdev_put(hib_resume_bdev, FMODE_READ | FMODE_EXCL);
> + blkdev_put(hib_resume_bdev, mode);
> else
> pr_debug("Image signature found, resuming\n");
> } else {
> --