From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Dae R. Jeong" <threeearcat@gmail.com>
Cc: bryantan@vmware.com, vdasa@vmware.com, pv-drivers@vmware.com,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmci_host: fix a race condition in vmci_host_poll() causing GPF
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:15:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCQPuaps5rCtGAb2@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCGFsdBAU4cYww5l@dragonet>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:01:53PM +0900, Dae R. Jeong wrote:
> During fuzzing, a general protection fault is observed in
> vmci_host_poll().
>
> general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000019: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000000c8-0x00000000000000cf]
> RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0xf3/0x5e00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4926
> <- omitting registers ->
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5672
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb3/0x100 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
> add_wait_queue+0x3d/0x260 kernel/sched/wait.c:22
> poll_wait include/linux/poll.h:49 [inline]
> vmci_host_poll+0xf8/0x2b0 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:174
> vfs_poll include/linux/poll.h:88 [inline]
> do_pollfd fs/select.c:873 [inline]
> do_poll fs/select.c:921 [inline]
> do_sys_poll+0xc7c/0x1aa0 fs/select.c:1015
> __do_sys_ppoll fs/select.c:1121 [inline]
> __se_sys_ppoll+0x2cc/0x330 fs/select.c:1101
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x4e/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
>
> Example thread interleaving that causes the general protection fault
> is as follows:
>
> CPU1 (vmci_host_poll) CPU2 (vmci_host_do_init_context)
> ----- -----
> // Read uninitialized context
> context = vmci_host_dev->context;
> // Initialize context
> vmci_host_dev->context = vmci_ctx_create();
> vmci_host_dev->ct_type = VMCIOBJ_CONTEXT;
>
> if (vmci_host_dev->ct_type == VMCIOBJ_CONTEXT) {
> // Dereferencing the wrong pointer
> poll_wait(..., &context->host_context);
> }
>
> In this scenario, vmci_host_poll() reads vmci_host_dev->context first,
> and then reads vmci_host_dev->ct_type to check that
> vmci_host_dev->context is initialized. However, since these two reads
> are not atomically executed, there is a chance of a race condition as
> described above.
>
> To fix this race condition, read vmci_host_dev->context after checking
> the value of vmci_host_dev->ct_type so that vmci_host_poll() always
> reads an initialized context.
>
> Reported-by: Dae R. Jeong <threeearcat@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 8bf503991f87 ("VMCI: host side driver implementation.")
> Signed-off-by: Dae R. Jeong <threeearcat@gmail.com>
If you author and sign-off on the patch, no need for a Reported-by: as
that is obvious :)
And how did you test this change?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-27 12:01 [PATCH] vmci_host: fix a race condition in vmci_host_poll() causing GPF Dae R. Jeong
2023-03-29 10:15 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-03-30 11:18 ` Dae R. Jeong
2023-04-11 20:33 ` Vishnu Dasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCQPuaps5rCtGAb2@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bryantan@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=threeearcat@gmail.com \
--cc=vdasa@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox