public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	bjorn@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	atishp@rivosinc.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
	horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:19:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCQewkvSpaI52DSM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328115150.2700016-2-chenjiahao16@huawei.com>

On 03/28/23 at 07:51pm, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to
> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if
> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction.
> 
> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large
> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in
> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution.
> Here introduce the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low].
> 
> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range
> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range
> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c |  5 ++++
>  arch/riscv/mm/init.c      | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 5d3184cbf518..ea84e5047c23 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,11 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto error;
>  	}
> +	if (crashk_low_res.start != crashk_low_res.end) {
> +		ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto error;
> +	}
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index 478d6763a01a..b7708cc467fa 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,28 @@ static inline void setup_vm_final(void)
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>  
> +/* Reserve 128M low memory by default for swiotlb buffer */
> +#define DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE	(128UL << 20)
> +
> +static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size)
> +{
> +	unsigned long long low_base;
> +
> +	low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, PMD_SIZE, 0, dma32_phys_limit);
> +	if (!low_base) {
> +		pr_err("cannot allocate crashkernel low memory (size:0x%llx).\n", low_size);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_info("crashkernel low memory reserved: 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> +		low_base, low_base + low_size, low_size >> 20);
> +
> +	crashk_low_res.start = low_base;
> +	crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
>   *
> @@ -1163,6 +1185,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long long crash_base = 0;
>  	unsigned long long crash_size = 0;
> +	unsigned long long crash_low_size = 0;
>  	unsigned long search_start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
>  	unsigned long search_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
>  
> @@ -1182,8 +1205,30 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>  
>  	ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
>  				&crash_size, &crash_base);
> -	if (ret || !crash_size)
> +	if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> +		/*
> +		 * crashkernel=X,[high,low] can be specified or not, but
> +		 * invalid value is not allowed.
> +		 */
> +		ret = parse_crashkernel_high(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_size, &crash_base);

I would add a local variable to assign boot_command_line to it just like
arm64 does. Then these lines could be shorter. 

	char *cmdline = boot_command_line;

> +		if (ret || !crash_size)
> +			return;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * crashkernel=Y,low is valid only when crashkernel=X,high
> +		 * is passed and high memory is reserved successful.
> +		 */
> +		ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_low_size, &crash_base);
> +		if (ret == -ENOENT)
> +			crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> +		else if (ret)
> +			return;
> +
> +		search_start = dma32_phys_limit;
> +	} else if (ret || !crash_size) {
> +		/* Invalid argument value specified */
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	crash_size = PAGE_ALIGN(crash_size);
>  
> @@ -1201,16 +1246,26 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>  	 */
>  	crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
>  					       search_start,
> -					       min(search_end, (unsigned long) SZ_4G));
> +					       min(search_end, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit));
>  	if (crash_base == 0) {

The above conditional check isn't right. If crashkernel=size@offset
specified, the reservation failure won't trigger retry. This seems to be
originally introduced by old commit, while this need be fixed firstly.

> -		/* Try again without restricting region to 32bit addressible memory */
> +		/* Try again above the region of 32bit addressible memory */
>  		crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> -						search_start, search_end);
> +						       max(search_start, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit),
> +						       search_end);
>  		if (crash_base == 0) {
>  			pr_warn("crashkernel: couldn't allocate %lldKB\n",
>  				crash_size >> 10);
>  			return;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (!crash_low_size)
> +			crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((crash_base > dma32_phys_limit - crash_low_size) &&
> +	    crash_low_size && reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) {
> +		memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size);
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	pr_info("crashkernel: reserved 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n",
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28 11:51 [PATCH -next v2 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low] Chen Jiahao
2023-03-29 11:19   ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-03-30 13:40     ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-30 23:32       ` Baoquan He
2023-03-31 11:36         ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-28 11:51 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/2] docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv Chen Jiahao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCQewkvSpaI52DSM@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox