From: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: addac: stx104: Migrate to the regmap API
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 09:43:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCg1FyfcOvpLrMmH@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230401145121.1a64a113@jic23-huawei>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1078 bytes --]
On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 02:51:21PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> >
> > > + do {
> > > + err = regmap_read(priv->aio_ctl_map, STX104_ADC_STATUS, &adc_status);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > + } while (u8_get_bits(adc_status, STX104_CNV));
> >
> > Hmm... Isn't it a potential infinite loop (e.g., ther hardware / firmware
> > is broken)?
> >
> > Why not using regmap_read_poll_timeout() (or its atomic variant, depends on
> > the case)?
>
> Just to shortcut things as I'm looking at this.
> That's currently handled in patch 2. Argument being this is a direct conversion
> of existing code, whereas changing to xxx_poll_timeout() is an improvement.
>
> I'm fine with it just being rolled into first patch with a note in the patch
> description though if that works better.
I'm going to keep it as a separate follow-up patch because introducing a
timeout is enough of a functional change to risk a regression that
having it in a dedicated commit makes it easier to revert later if we
need to.
William Breathitt Gray
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-01 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-26 22:05 [PATCH v3 0/2] Migrate STX104 to the regmap API William Breathitt Gray
2023-03-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: addac: stx104: Migrate " William Breathitt Gray
2023-03-27 11:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-04-01 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-04-01 13:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-04-01 13:43 ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
2023-04-01 14:06 ` William Breathitt Gray
2023-04-02 16:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-04-02 14:51 ` William Breathitt Gray
2023-03-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: addac: stx104: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout() for conversion poll William Breathitt Gray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCg1FyfcOvpLrMmH@fedora \
--to=william.gray@linaro.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox