From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@gmail.com>
Cc: hns@goldelico.com, richard.leitner@linux.dev,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@skidata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Input: tsc2007 - enable cansleep pendown GPIO
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 22:51:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCkXzQ38N44Y7H+I@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328-tsc2007-sleep-v4-1-2ede92ec9b71@skidata.com>
Hi Benjamin,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:10:37PM +0200, Benjamin Bara wrote:
> From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@skidata.com>
>
> When a hard IRQ is triggered, the soft IRQ, which decides if an actual
> pen down happened, should always be triggered. This enables the usage of
> "can_sleep" GPIO chips as "pen down" GPIO, as the value is not read
> during the hard IRQ anymore. This might be the case if the GPIO chip is
> an expander behind i2c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@skidata.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
> ---
> Hi!
>
> I found a different approach to my problem:
> If the primary IRQ handler is set to NULL, the default primary IRQ
> handler simply triggers a soft IRQ handler wake up. As the hard IRQ is
> only triggered when a pen down is detected, the gpiod_get_value() inside
> tsc2007_is_pen_down() always returns true and therefore can be
> neglected.
Don't you need to switch to gpio_get_valued_cansleep() in
tsc2007_is_pen_down() to actually allow sleeping gpios?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-02 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 19:10 [PATCH v4] Input: tsc2007 - enable cansleep pendown GPIO Benjamin Bara
2023-04-02 5:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCkXzQ38N44Y7H+I@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=bbara93@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.bara@skidata.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.leitner@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox