From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju@buaa.edu.cn>
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: mac80211: Add NULL checks for sta->sdata
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:51:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCwBFL/nZ+S2Df3N@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f70554b9-eedf-43e4-9a55-a809e9b9e89a@buaa.edu.cn>
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 05:58:13PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thanks for your reply, and sorry for the delay.
>
> On 2023/3/26 23:05, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 05:31:22PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > > In a previous commit 69403bad97aa ("wifi: mac80211: sdata can be NULL
> > > during AMPDU start"), sta->sdata can be NULL, and thus it should be
> > > checked before being used.
> > >
> > > However, in the same call stack, sta->sdata is also used in the
> > > following functions:
> > >
> > > ieee80211_ba_session_work()
> > > ___ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session(sta)
> > > ht_dbg(sta->sdata, ...); -> No check
> > > sdata_info(sta->sdata, ...); -> No check
> > > ieee80211_send_delba(sta->sdata, ...) -> No check
> > > ___ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session(sta)
> > > ht_dbg(sta->sdata, ...); -> No check
> > > ht_dbg_ratelimited(sta->sdata, ...); -> No check
> > > ieee80211_tx_ba_session_handle_start(sta)
> > > sdata = sta->sdata; if (!sdata) -> Add check by previous commit
> > > ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session(sdata)
> > > ht_dbg(sta->sdata, ...); -> No check
> > > ieee80211_start_tx_ba_cb(sdata)
> > > sdata = sta->sdata; local = sdata->local -> No check
> > > ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_cb(sdata)
> > > ht_dbg(sta->sdata, ...); -> No check
> > >
> > > Thus, to avoid possible null-pointer dereferences, the related checks
> > > should be added.
> > >
> > > These bugs are reported by a static analysis tool implemented by myself,
> > > and they are found by extending a known bug fixed in the previous commit.
> > > Thus, they could be theoretical bugs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju@buaa.edu.cn>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > * Fix an error reported by checkpatch.pl, and make the bug finding
> > > process more clear in the description. Thanks for Simon's advice.
> > > ---
> > > net/mac80211/agg-rx.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > net/mac80211/agg-tx.c | 16 ++++++++--
> > > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
> > > index c6fa53230450..6616970785a2 100644
> > > --- a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
> > > +++ b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
> > > @@ -80,19 +80,21 @@ void ___ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session(struct sta_info *sta, u16 tid,
> > > RCU_INIT_POINTER(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid], NULL);
> > > __clear_bit(tid, sta->ampdu_mlme.agg_session_valid);
> > > - ht_dbg(sta->sdata,
> > > - "Rx BA session stop requested for %pM tid %u %s reason: %d\n", > - sta->sta.addr, tid,
> > > - initiator == WLAN_BACK_RECIPIENT ? "recipient" : "initiator",
> > > - (int)reason);
> > > + if (sta->sdata) {
> > > + ht_dbg(sta->sdata,
> > > + "Rx BA session stop requested for %pM tid %u %s reason: %d\n",
> > > + sta->sta.addr, tid,
> > > + initiator == WLAN_BACK_RECIPIENT ? "recipient" : "initiator",
> > > + (int)reason);
> > > + }
> > The first line of the body of ___ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session() is:
> >
> > struct ieee80211_local *local = sta->sdata->local;
> >
> > So a NULL pointer dereference will have occurred before
> > the checks this change adds to that function.
>
> I checked the source code again (including the latest version 6.3-rc5).
> The first line of the body of ___ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session() is:
>
> struct ieee80211_local *local = sta->local;
>
> Thus, there is no dereference of sta->sdata.
My mistake, sorry about that.
> In a different function, namely ___ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session(), the
> first line is:
>
> struct ieee80211_local *local = sta->sdata->local;
Yes, I see that too.
...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-04 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-21 9:31 [PATCH v2] net: mac80211: Add NULL checks for sta->sdata Jia-Ju Bai
2023-03-26 15:05 ` Simon Horman
2023-04-04 9:58 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2023-04-04 10:51 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCwBFL/nZ+S2Df3N@corigine.com \
--to=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=baijiaju@buaa.edu.cn \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox