From: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] bpf: lirc program type should not require SYS_CAP_ADMIN
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:17:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZD0ArKpwnDBJZsrE@gofer.mess.org> (raw)
Make it possible to load lirc program type with just CAP_BPF. There is
nothing exceptional about lirc programs that means they require
SYS_CAP_ADMIN.
In order to attach or detach a lirc program type you need permission to
open /dev/lirc0; if you have permission to do that, you can alter all
sorts of lirc receiving options. Changing the IR protocol decoder is no
different.
Right now on a typical distribution /dev/lirc devices are only
read/write by root. Ideally we would make them group read/write like
other devices so that local users can use them without becoming root.
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
v2: improved commit message
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 6d575505f89c..822ebc742a6a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2463,7 +2463,6 @@ static bool is_net_admin_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG:
- case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LIRC_MODE2:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE:
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK:
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-17 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 8:17 Sean Young [this message]
2023-04-17 20:30 ` [PATCH v2] bpf: lirc program type should not require SYS_CAP_ADMIN patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZD0ArKpwnDBJZsrE@gofer.mess.org \
--to=sean@mess.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox