From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] dmaengine: idxd: Add enable/disable device IOPF feature
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:22:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDY5IYL5NMGEOihl@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230411064815.31456-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On 11-04-23, 14:47, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The iommu subsystem requires IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF must be enabled before
> and disabled after IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA, if device's I/O page faults rely
> on the IOMMU. Add explicit IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF enabling/disabling in this
> driver.
>
> At present, missing IOPF enabling/disabling doesn't cause any real issue,
> because the IOMMU driver places the IOPF enabling/disabling in the path
> of SVA feature handling. But this may change.
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324120234.313643-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
> ---
> drivers/dma/idxd/init.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> index 640d3048368e..09ef62aa0635 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
> @@ -516,6 +516,27 @@ static void idxd_disable_system_pasid(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> idxd->sva = NULL;
> }
>
> +static int idxd_enable_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = iommu_dev_enable_feature(&pdev->dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = iommu_dev_enable_feature(&pdev->dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> + if (ret)
> + iommu_dev_disable_feature(&pdev->dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void idxd_disable_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + iommu_dev_disable_feature(&pdev->dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> + iommu_dev_disable_feature(&pdev->dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF);
> +}
> +
> static int idxd_probe(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = idxd->pdev;
> @@ -530,7 +551,7 @@ static int idxd_probe(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> dev_dbg(dev, "IDXD reset complete\n");
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IDXD_SVM) && sva) {
> - if (iommu_dev_enable_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA)) {
> + if (idxd_enable_sva(pdev)) {
> dev_warn(dev, "Unable to turn on user SVA feature.\n");
> } else {
> set_bit(IDXD_FLAG_USER_PASID_ENABLED, &idxd->flags);
> @@ -578,21 +599,19 @@ static int idxd_probe(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> if (device_pasid_enabled(idxd))
> idxd_disable_system_pasid(idxd);
> if (device_user_pasid_enabled(idxd))
> - iommu_dev_disable_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> + idxd_disable_sva(pdev);
> return rc;
> }
>
> static void idxd_cleanup(struct idxd_device *idxd)
> {
> - struct device *dev = &idxd->pdev->dev;
> -
> perfmon_pmu_remove(idxd);
> idxd_cleanup_interrupts(idxd);
> idxd_cleanup_internals(idxd);
> if (device_pasid_enabled(idxd))
> idxd_disable_system_pasid(idxd);
> if (device_user_pasid_enabled(idxd))
> - iommu_dev_disable_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> + idxd_disable_sva(idxd->pdev);
> }
>
> static int idxd_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> @@ -710,7 +729,7 @@ static void idxd_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> pci_iounmap(pdev, idxd->reg_base);
> if (device_user_pasid_enabled(idxd))
> - iommu_dev_disable_feature(&pdev->dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA);
> + idxd_disable_sva(pdev);
> pci_disable_device(pdev);
> destroy_workqueue(idxd->wq);
> perfmon_pmu_remove(idxd);
> --
> 2.34.1
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-11 6:47 [PATCH 00/17] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.4 Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:47 ` [PATCH 01/17] dmaengine: idxd: Add enable/disable device IOPF feature Lu Baolu
2023-04-12 4:52 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 02/17] iommu/vt-d: Allow SVA with device-specific IOPF Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 03/17] iommu/vt-d: Move iopf code from SVA to IOPF enabling path Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 04/17] iommu/vt-d: Move pfsid and ats_qdep calculation to device probe path Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 05/17] iommu/vt-d: Move PRI handling to IOPF feature path Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 06/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary checks in iopf disabling path Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 07/17] iommu/vt-d: Do not use GFP_ATOMIC when not needed Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 08/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove extern from function prototypes Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 09/17] iommu/vt-d: Use non-privileged mode for all PASIDs Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 10/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove PASID supervisor request support Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 11/17] iommu/vt-d: Fix operand size in bitwise operation Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 21:22 ` David Laight
2023-04-12 1:31 ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-12 7:11 ` David Laight
2023-04-12 8:11 ` Zhang, Tina
2023-04-12 13:10 ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-12 13:27 ` David Laight
2023-04-12 14:02 ` Baolu Lu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 12/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove BUG_ON on checking valid pfn range Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 13/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove BUG_ON in handling iotlb cache invalidation Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 14/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove BUG_ON when domain->pgd is NULL Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 15/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove BUG_ON in map/unmap() Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 16/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove a useless BUG_ON(dev->is_virtfn) Lu Baolu
2023-04-11 6:48 ` [PATCH 17/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove BUG_ON in dmar_insert_dev_scope() Lu Baolu
2023-04-13 4:12 ` [PATCH 00/17] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.4 Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDY5IYL5NMGEOihl@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tina.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox