public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com,
	pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] soundwire: bus: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_put() causing usage count underflow
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:34:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDaCRwU+WFqNo5iL@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406134640.8582-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>

On 06-04-23, 14:46, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> This reverts commit
> 443a98e649b4 ("soundwire: bus: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get()")
> 
> Change calls to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() back to pm_runtime_get_sync().
> This fixes a usage count underrun caused by doing a pm_runtime_put() even
> though pm_runtime_resume_and_get() returned an error.
> 
> The three affected functions ignore -EACCES error from trying to get
> pm_runtime, and carry on, including a put at the end of the function.
> But pm_runtime_resume_and_get() does not increment the usage count if it
> returns an error. So in the -EACCES case you must not call
> pm_runtime_put().
> 
> The documentation for pm_runtime_get_sync() says:
>  "Consider using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() ...  as this is likely to
>  result in cleaner code."
> 
> In this case I don't think it results in cleaner code because the
> pm_runtime_put() at the end of the function would have to be conditional on
> the return value from pm_runtime_resume_and_get() at the top of the
> function.
> 
> pm_runtime_get_sync() doesn't have this problem because it always
> increments the count, so always needs a put. The code can just flow through
> and do the pm_runtime_put() unconditionally.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod

      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-06 13:46 [PATCH RESEND] soundwire: bus: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_put() causing usage count underflow Richard Fitzgerald
2023-04-12 10:04 ` Vinod Koul [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZDaCRwU+WFqNo5iL@matsya \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox