From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: Zhang Yuchen <zhangyuchen.lcr@bytedance.com>
Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: fix SSIF not responding under certain cond.
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:34:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDalaSuK1P7Tg3sC@minyard.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412074907.80046-1-zhangyuchen.lcr@bytedance.com>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 03:49:07PM +0800, Zhang Yuchen wrote:
> The ipmi communication is not restored after a specific version of BMC is
> upgraded on our server.
> The ipmi driver does not respond after printing the following log:
Excellent explaination, this is queued in my branch for the next release
and marked for backport.
Thank you,
-corey
>
> ipmi_ssif: Invalid response getting flags: 1c 1
>
> I found that after entering this branch, ssif_info->ssif_state always
> holds SSIF_GETTING_FLAGS and never return to IDLE.
>
> As a result, the driver cannot be loaded, because the driver status is
> checked during the unload process and must be IDLE in shutdown_ssif():
>
> while (ssif_info->ssif_state != SSIF_IDLE)
> schedule_timeout(1);
>
> The process trigger this problem is:
>
> 1. One msg timeout and next msg start send, and call
> ssif_set_need_watch().
>
> 2. ssif_set_need_watch()->watch_timeout()->start_flag_fetch() change
> ssif_state to SSIF_GETTING_FLAGS.
>
> 3. In msg_done_handler() ssif_state == SSIF_GETTING_FLAGS, if an error
> message is received, the second branch does not modify the ssif_state.
>
> 4. All retry action need IS_SSIF_IDLE() == True. Include retry action in
> watch_timeout(), msg_done_handler(). Sending msg does not work either.
> SSIF_IDLE is also checked in start_next_msg().
>
> 5. The only thing that can be triggered in the SSIF driver is
> watch_timeout(), after destory_user(), this timer will stop too.
>
> So, if enter this branch, the ssif_state will remain SSIF_GETTING_FLAGS
> and can't send msg, no timer started, can't unload.
>
> We did a comparative test before and after adding this patch, and the
> result is effective.
>
> Fixes: 259307074bfc ("ipmi: Add SMBus interface driver (SSIF)")
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yuchen <zhangyuchen.lcr@bytedance.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> index a5ddebb1edea..48be3694fa64 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> @@ -784,9 +784,9 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result,
> } else if (data[0] != (IPMI_NETFN_APP_REQUEST | 1) << 2
> || data[1] != IPMI_GET_MSG_FLAGS_CMD) {
> /*
> - * Don't abort here, maybe it was a queued
> - * response to a previous command.
> + * Recv error response, give up.
> */
> + ssif_info->ssif_state = SSIF_IDLE;
> ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond(ssif_info, flags);
> dev_warn(&ssif_info->client->dev,
> "Invalid response getting flags: %x %x\n",
> --
> 2.20.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-12 7:49 [PATCH] ipmi: fix SSIF not responding under certain cond Zhang Yuchen
2023-04-12 12:34 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDalaSuK1P7Tg3sC@minyard.net \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zhangyuchen.lcr@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox