public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yogesh Hegde <yogi.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8192e: Fix comparison to NULL of variable rf_set_sens
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:21:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDbvoULAO6wdeso1@Zephyrus-G14> (raw)

Functions _rtl92e_wx_get_sens and _rtl92e_wx_set_sens depend on the
function rf_set_sens, which is declared but never defined.
Hence calling this function will cause an oops.
Because there is no definition of the function priv->rf_set_sens
will always be NULL.

As a result _rtl92e_wx_set_sens and _rtl92e_wx_get_sens will always
return -1.

Hence,
* Removed function definition rf_set_sens
* Removed usage of variable priv->rf_set_sens
* Removed functions _rtl92e_wx_get_sens and _rtl92e_wx_set_sens
* Cleaned up the variables sens and max_sens used in these functions

Suggested-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Yogesh Hegde <yogi.kernel@gmail.com>
---
Changed in v3:
- Fixed description to fit within 75 chars
- Added suggested tags

as Suggested by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>

Changed in v2:
- Removed function definition rf_set_sens
- Removed usage of variable priv->rf_set_sens
- Removed functions _rtl92e_wx_get_sens and _rtl92e_wx_set_sens
- Cleaned up the variables sens and max_sens used in these functions
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h |  3 --
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c   | 45 --------------------
 2 files changed, 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h
index 2b2d8af4cf6e..a949a3833cca 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h
@@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ struct r8192_priv {
 	struct rt_stats stats;
 	struct iw_statistics			wstats;
 
-	short (*rf_set_sens)(struct net_device *dev, short sens);
 	u8 (*rf_set_chan)(struct net_device *dev, u8 ch);
 
 	struct rx_desc *rx_ring[MAX_RX_QUEUE];
@@ -274,8 +273,6 @@ struct r8192_priv {
 	short	promisc;
 
 	short	chan;
-	short	sens;
-	short	max_sens;
 	bool ps_force;
 
 	u32 irq_mask[2];
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
index cb28288a618b..0bb657fda06c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
@@ -311,10 +311,6 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_get_range(struct net_device *dev,
 	/* ~130 Mb/s real (802.11n) */
 	range->throughput = 130 * 1000 * 1000;
 
-	if (priv->rf_set_sens != NULL)
-		/* signal level threshold range */
-		range->sensitivity = priv->max_sens;
-
 	range->max_qual.qual = 100;
 	range->max_qual.level = 0;
 	range->max_qual.noise = 0;
@@ -807,45 +803,6 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_get_retry(struct net_device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int _rtl92e_wx_get_sens(struct net_device *dev,
-			       struct iw_request_info *info,
-			       union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
-{
-	struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
-
-	if (priv->rf_set_sens == NULL)
-		return -1; /* we have not this support for this radio */
-	wrqu->sens.value = priv->sens;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int _rtl92e_wx_set_sens(struct net_device *dev,
-			       struct iw_request_info *info,
-			       union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
-{
-	struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
-
-	short err = 0;
-
-	if (priv->hw_radio_off)
-		return 0;
-
-	mutex_lock(&priv->wx_mutex);
-	if (priv->rf_set_sens == NULL) {
-		err = -1; /* we have not this support for this radio */
-		goto exit;
-	}
-	if (priv->rf_set_sens(dev, wrqu->sens.value) == 0)
-		priv->sens = wrqu->sens.value;
-	else
-		err = -EINVAL;
-
-exit:
-	mutex_unlock(&priv->wx_mutex);
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 static int _rtl92e_wx_set_encode_ext(struct net_device *dev,
 				     struct iw_request_info *info,
 				     union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
@@ -1066,8 +1023,6 @@ static iw_handler r8192_wx_handlers[] = {
 	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWFREQ)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_freq,
 	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCSIWMODE)] = _rtl92e_wx_set_mode,
 	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWMODE)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_mode,
-	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCSIWSENS)] = _rtl92e_wx_set_sens,
-	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWSENS)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_sens,
 	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWRANGE)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_range,
 	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCSIWAP)] = _rtl92e_wx_set_wap,
 	[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWAP)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_wap,
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12 17:51 Yogesh Hegde [this message]
2023-04-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8192e: Fix comparison to NULL of variable rf_set_sens Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZDbvoULAO6wdeso1@Zephyrus-G14 \
    --to=yogi.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox