From: Yogesh Hegde <yogi.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8192e: Fix comparison to NULL of variable rf_set_sens
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:21:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDbvoULAO6wdeso1@Zephyrus-G14> (raw)
Functions _rtl92e_wx_get_sens and _rtl92e_wx_set_sens depend on the
function rf_set_sens, which is declared but never defined.
Hence calling this function will cause an oops.
Because there is no definition of the function priv->rf_set_sens
will always be NULL.
As a result _rtl92e_wx_set_sens and _rtl92e_wx_get_sens will always
return -1.
Hence,
* Removed function definition rf_set_sens
* Removed usage of variable priv->rf_set_sens
* Removed functions _rtl92e_wx_get_sens and _rtl92e_wx_set_sens
* Cleaned up the variables sens and max_sens used in these functions
Suggested-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Hegde <yogi.kernel@gmail.com>
---
Changed in v3:
- Fixed description to fit within 75 chars
- Added suggested tags
as Suggested by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
Changed in v2:
- Removed function definition rf_set_sens
- Removed usage of variable priv->rf_set_sens
- Removed functions _rtl92e_wx_get_sens and _rtl92e_wx_set_sens
- Cleaned up the variables sens and max_sens used in these functions
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h | 3 --
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c | 45 --------------------
2 files changed, 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h
index 2b2d8af4cf6e..a949a3833cca 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.h
@@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ struct r8192_priv {
struct rt_stats stats;
struct iw_statistics wstats;
- short (*rf_set_sens)(struct net_device *dev, short sens);
u8 (*rf_set_chan)(struct net_device *dev, u8 ch);
struct rx_desc *rx_ring[MAX_RX_QUEUE];
@@ -274,8 +273,6 @@ struct r8192_priv {
short promisc;
short chan;
- short sens;
- short max_sens;
bool ps_force;
u32 irq_mask[2];
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
index cb28288a618b..0bb657fda06c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
@@ -311,10 +311,6 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_get_range(struct net_device *dev,
/* ~130 Mb/s real (802.11n) */
range->throughput = 130 * 1000 * 1000;
- if (priv->rf_set_sens != NULL)
- /* signal level threshold range */
- range->sensitivity = priv->max_sens;
-
range->max_qual.qual = 100;
range->max_qual.level = 0;
range->max_qual.noise = 0;
@@ -807,45 +803,6 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_get_retry(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static int _rtl92e_wx_get_sens(struct net_device *dev,
- struct iw_request_info *info,
- union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
-{
- struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
-
- if (priv->rf_set_sens == NULL)
- return -1; /* we have not this support for this radio */
- wrqu->sens.value = priv->sens;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int _rtl92e_wx_set_sens(struct net_device *dev,
- struct iw_request_info *info,
- union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
-{
- struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
-
- short err = 0;
-
- if (priv->hw_radio_off)
- return 0;
-
- mutex_lock(&priv->wx_mutex);
- if (priv->rf_set_sens == NULL) {
- err = -1; /* we have not this support for this radio */
- goto exit;
- }
- if (priv->rf_set_sens(dev, wrqu->sens.value) == 0)
- priv->sens = wrqu->sens.value;
- else
- err = -EINVAL;
-
-exit:
- mutex_unlock(&priv->wx_mutex);
-
- return err;
-}
-
static int _rtl92e_wx_set_encode_ext(struct net_device *dev,
struct iw_request_info *info,
union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
@@ -1066,8 +1023,6 @@ static iw_handler r8192_wx_handlers[] = {
[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWFREQ)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_freq,
[IW_IOCTL(SIOCSIWMODE)] = _rtl92e_wx_set_mode,
[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWMODE)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_mode,
- [IW_IOCTL(SIOCSIWSENS)] = _rtl92e_wx_set_sens,
- [IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWSENS)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_sens,
[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWRANGE)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_range,
[IW_IOCTL(SIOCSIWAP)] = _rtl92e_wx_set_wap,
[IW_IOCTL(SIOCGIWAP)] = _rtl92e_wx_get_wap,
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-12 17:51 Yogesh Hegde [this message]
2023-04-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v3] staging: rtl8192e: Fix comparison to NULL of variable rf_set_sens Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDbvoULAO6wdeso1@Zephyrus-G14 \
--to=yogi.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox