Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: relax sanity check if checkpoint is corrupted

[Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>]

On 04/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/4/13 0:17, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > 1. extent_cache
> >   - let's drop the largest extent_cache
> > 2. invalidate_block
> >   - don't show the warnings
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >   Change log from v1:
> >    - add one more case to skip the error message
> > 
> >   fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c   | 10 ++++++++++
> >   fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> >   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 448ecf5000b8..64b3860f50ee 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -152,6 +152,11 @@ static bool __is_bitmap_valid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
> >   	se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> >   	exist = f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map);
> > +
> > +	/* skip data, if we already have an error in checkpoint. */
> > +	if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > +		return exist;
> > +
> >   	if (exist && type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_UPDATE) {
> >   		f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent error blkaddr:%u, sit bitmap:%d",
> >   			 blkaddr, exist);
> > @@ -202,6 +207,11 @@ bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >   	case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_UPDATE:
> >   		if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> >   				blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) {
> > +
> > +			/* Skip to emit an error message. */
> > +			if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > +				return false;
> > +
> >   			f2fs_warn(sbi, "access invalid blkaddr:%u",
> >   				  blkaddr);
> >   			set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> > index 9a8153895d20..bea6ab9d846a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> > @@ -23,18 +23,26 @@ bool sanity_check_extent_cache(struct inode *inode)
> >   {
> >   	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> >   	struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
> > +	struct extent_tree *et = fi->extent_tree[EX_READ];
> >   	struct extent_info *ei;
> > -	if (!fi->extent_tree[EX_READ])
> > +	if (!et)
> > +		return true;
> > +
> > +	ei = &et->largest;
> > +	if (!ei->len)
> >   		return true;
> > -	ei = &fi->extent_tree[EX_READ]->largest;
> > +	/* Let's drop, if checkpoint got corrupted. */
> > +	if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_ERROR_FLAG)) {
> > +		ei->len = 0;
> > +		et->largest_updated = true;
> 
> Thsi field indicates whether it is needed to update largest extent into
> inode page, since cp_error is unrecoverable, it seems we don't needed to
> update it.

Intention is to avoid any assumption like that, but sync the same logic when
updating this.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > +		return true;
> > +	}
> > -	if (ei->len &&
> > -		(!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk,
> > -					DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) ||
> > -		!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk + ei->len - 1,
> > -					DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))) {
> > +	if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) ||
> > +	    !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ei->blk + ei->len - 1,
> > +					DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> >   		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> >   		f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx) extent info [%u, %u, %u] is incorrect, run fsck to fix",
> >   			  __func__, inode->i_ino,