From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Preserve TDP MMU roots until they are explicitly invalidated
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:54:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEiEPVR7d+fwQ75y@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZEhN0D1zZyRDeyYz@google.com>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, David Matlack wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 05:36:37PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023, David Matlack wrote:
> > > It'd be nice to keep around the lockdep assertion though for the other (and
> > > future) callers. The cleanest options I can think of are:
> > >
> > > 1. Pass in a bool "vm_teardown" kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() and
> > > use that to gate the lockdep assertion.
> > > 2. Take the mmu_lock for read in kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu() and pass
> > > down bool shared to kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots().
> > >
> > > Both would satisfy your concern of not blocking teardown on the async
> > > worker and my concern of keeping the lockdep check. I think I prefer
> > > (1) since, as you point out, taking the mmu_lock at all is
> > > unnecessary.
> >
> > Hmm, another option:
> >
> > 3. Refactor the code so that kvm_arch_init_vm() doesn't call
> > kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() when VM creation fails, and then lockdep
> > can ignore on users_count==0 without hitting the false positive.
> >
> > I like (2) the least. Not sure I prefer (1) versus (3). I dislike passing bools
> > just to ignore lockdep, but reworking code for a "never hit in practice" edge case
> > is arguably worse :-/
>
> Agree (2) is the worst option. (3) seems potentially brittle (likely to
> trigger a false-positive lockdep warning if the code ever gets
> refactored back).
>
> How about throwing some underscores at the problem?
LOL, now we're speaking my language.
I think I have a better option though. The false positives on users_count can be
suppressed by gating the assert on kvm->created_vcpus. If KVM_CREATE_VM fails then
it's impossible for the VM to have created vCPUs. I like this option in particular
because it captures why it's safe for the KVM_CREATE_VM error path to run without
mmu_lock (no vCPUs == no roots).
I'll manually test this against the error path tomorrow:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) &&
refcount_read(&kvm->users_count) && kvm->created_vcpus)
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 21:49 [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Preserve TDP MMU roots until they are explicitly invalidated Sean Christopherson
2023-04-21 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-21 23:12 ` David Matlack
2023-04-22 1:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-24 23:54 ` David Matlack
2023-04-25 0:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-25 22:01 ` David Matlack
2023-04-26 1:54 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEiEPVR7d+fwQ75y@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).