public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Call pm_runtime_put_sync() only after device_remove()
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 09:40:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZF3tUQFTeILXV_VT@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jvJT4JkHtO3RCUEzkfawxLCwR=QO2Y2CsL=cYN9s4hXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 04:44:25PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 1:48 PM Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:

> > No, this seems like very bad idea and even violates the documentation
> > which clearly states that the usage counter is balanced before calling
> > remove() so that drivers can use pm_runtime_suspend() to put devices
> > into suspended state.
> 
> I missed that, sorry.
> 
> > There's is really no good reason to even try to change as this is in no
> > way a fast path.
> 
> Still, I think that while the "put" part needs to be done before
> device_remove(), the actual state change can be carried out later.
> 
> So something like
> 
>     pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> 
>     device_remove(dev);
> 
>     pm_runtime_suspend(dev);
> 
> would generally work, wouldn't it?

No, as drivers typically disable runtime pm in their remove callbacks,
that pm_runtime_suspend() would amount to a no-op (and calling the
driver pm ops post unbind and the driver having freed its data would
not work either).

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-12  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11  7:34 [PATCH] driver core: Call pm_runtime_put_sync() only after device_remove() Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-11 10:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-05-11 10:39   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-11 11:48     ` Johan Hovold
2023-05-11 14:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-05-12  7:40         ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2023-05-12 14:04           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-05-12 15:00             ` Johan Hovold
2023-05-12 15:04               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-05-12 18:49           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-17  8:28             ` Johan Hovold
2023-05-17  9:55               ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-05-11 14:46       ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZF3tUQFTeILXV_VT@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox