From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@mediatek.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
peter.wang@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com,
alice.chao@mediatek.com, powen.kao@mediatek.com,
naomi.chu@mediatek.com, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ufs: don't use the fair tag sharings
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 07:02:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZF5G5ztMng8Xbd1W@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa9af9ae-62a4-6469-244c-b5d9106bb044@acm.org>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:38:04AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> For which devices is the fair sharing algorithm useful? As far as I know the
> legacy block layer did not have an equivalent of the fair sharing algorithm
> and I'm not aware of any complaints about the legacy block layer regarding
> to fairness. This is why I proposed in January to remove the fair sharing
> code entirely. See also https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230103195337.158625-1-bvanassche@acm.org/.
Because the old code did not do tag allocation itself? Either way I
don't think a "I'll opt out for a random driver" is the proper approach
when you think it's not needed. Especially not without any data
explaining why just that driver is a special snowflake.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-12 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-09 6:52 [PATCH 0/2] block: improve the share tag set performance Ed Tsai
2023-05-09 6:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: make the fair sharing of tag configurable Ed Tsai
2023-05-09 21:33 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-11 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-22 5:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-09 6:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] ufs: don't use the fair tag sharings Ed Tsai
2023-05-09 8:03 ` Avri Altman
2023-05-09 14:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-09 16:19 ` Avri Altman
2023-05-09 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-10 5:21 ` Avri Altman
2023-05-10 15:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-11 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-11 15:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-12 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-05-12 18:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-13 3:09 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-16 15:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-17 7:49 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-17 18:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-18 1:49 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-18 2:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-05-18 7:55 ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-13 14:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-14 1:58 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-10 22:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] block: improve the share tag set performance Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZF5G5ztMng8Xbd1W@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=alice.chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=ed.tsai@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=naomi.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=powen.kao@mediatek.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox