public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename MMU_WARN_ON() to KVM_MMU_WARN_ON()
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 16:23:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZF7KbsCXBQHnOv7g@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230511235917.639770-5-seanjc@google.com>

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 04:59:12PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Rename MMU_WARN_ON() to make it super obvious that the assertions are
> all about KVM's MMU, not the primary MMU.

I think adding KVM is a step in the right direction but I have 2
remaining problems with KVM_MMU_WARN_ON():

 - Reminds me of VM_WARN_ON(), which toggles between WARN_ON() and
   BUG_ON(), whereas KVM_MMU_WARN_ON() toggles between no-op and
   WARN_ON().

 - It's not obvious from the name that it's a no-op most of the time.

Naming is hard so I might just make things worse by trying but...

How about KVM_MMU_PROVE(condition). That directly pairs it with the new
CONFIG_KVM_PROVE_MMU(), makes it sufficiently different from
VM_WARN_ON() and WARN_ON() that readers will not make assumptions about
what's happening under the hood. Also "PROVE" sounds like a high bar
which conveys this might not always be enabled.

That also will allow us to convert this to a WARN_ON_ONCE() (my
suggestion on the other patch) without having to make the name any
longer.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-12 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11 23:59 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Clean up MMU_DEBUG and BUG/WARN usage Sean Christopherson
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Delete pgprintk() and all its usage Sean Christopherson
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Delete rmap_printk() " Sean Christopherson
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Delete the "dbg" module param Sean Christopherson
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename MMU_WARN_ON() to KVM_MMU_WARN_ON() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-12 23:23   ` David Matlack [this message]
2023-05-12 23:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-12 23:35       ` David Matlack
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Convert "runtime" WARN_ON() assertions to WARN_ON_ONCE() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-12 23:14   ` David Matlack
2023-05-12 23:18     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-12 23:24       ` David Matlack
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug the VM if a vCPU ends up in long mode without PAE enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-05-12 23:33   ` David Matlack
2023-05-12 23:40     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace MMU_DEBUG with proper KVM_PROVE_MMU Kconfig Sean Christopherson
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Plumb "struct kvm" all the way to pte_list_remove() Sean Christopherson
2023-05-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86/mmu: BUG() in rmap helpers iff CONFIG_BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION=y Sean Christopherson
2023-05-18 19:05   ` Mingwei Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZF7KbsCXBQHnOv7g@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox