public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner
@ 2023-05-13 10:12 Anup Sharma
  2023-05-16  7:28 ` Neil Armstrong
  2023-05-16  8:25 ` Neil Armstrong
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anup Sharma @ 2023-05-13 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Inki Dae, Jagan Teki, Marek Szyprowski, Andrzej Hajda,
	Neil Armstrong, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, dri-devel,
	linux-kernel
  Cc: anupnewsmail

There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
module_platform_driver() helper function.

Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
semantic patch as:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c:1957:6-11: No need to set .owner here.
The core will do it.

No functional changes are intended.

Signed-off-by: Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
index e0a402a85787..10dc3315e69e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
@@ -1954,7 +1954,6 @@ static struct platform_driver samsung_dsim_driver = {
 	.remove = samsung_dsim_remove,
 	.driver = {
 		   .name = "samsung-dsim",
-		   .owner = THIS_MODULE,
 		   .pm = &samsung_dsim_pm_ops,
 		   .of_match_table = samsung_dsim_of_match,
 	},
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner
  2023-05-13 10:12 [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner Anup Sharma
@ 2023-05-16  7:28 ` Neil Armstrong
  2023-05-16  8:25 ` Neil Armstrong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Armstrong @ 2023-05-16  7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anup Sharma, Inki Dae, Jagan Teki, Marek Szyprowski,
	Andrzej Hajda, Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman,
	Jernej Skrabec, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, dri-devel,
	linux-kernel

On 13/05/2023 12:12, Anup Sharma wrote:
> There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
> device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
> takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
> module_platform_driver() helper function.
> 
> Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
> semantic patch as:
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c:1957:6-11: No need to set .owner here.
> The core will do it.
> 
> No functional changes are intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index e0a402a85787..10dc3315e69e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -1954,7 +1954,6 @@ static struct platform_driver samsung_dsim_driver = {
>   	.remove = samsung_dsim_remove,
>   	.driver = {
>   		   .name = "samsung-dsim",
> -		   .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>   		   .pm = &samsung_dsim_pm_ops,
>   		   .of_match_table = samsung_dsim_of_match,
>   	},

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner
  2023-05-13 10:12 [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner Anup Sharma
  2023-05-16  7:28 ` Neil Armstrong
@ 2023-05-16  8:25 ` Neil Armstrong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Armstrong @ 2023-05-16  8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Inki Dae, Jagan Teki, Marek Szyprowski, Andrzej Hajda,
	Robert Foss, Laurent Pinchart, Jonas Karlman, Jernej Skrabec,
	David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, dri-devel, linux-kernel, Anup Sharma

Hi,

On Sat, 13 May 2023 15:42:17 +0530, Anup Sharma wrote:
> There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
> device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
> takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
> module_platform_driver() helper function.
> 
> Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
> semantic patch as:
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c:1957:6-11: No need to set .owner here.
> The core will do it.
> 
> [...]

Thanks, Applied to https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-misc.git (drm-misc-next)

[1/1] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner
      https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=728cb3f061e2b3a002fd76d91c2449b1497b6640

-- 
Neil


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-16  8:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-13 10:12 [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner Anup Sharma
2023-05-16  7:28 ` Neil Armstrong
2023-05-16  8:25 ` Neil Armstrong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox