From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7B6C77B73 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 17:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234380AbjEBRkX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2023 13:40:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233858AbjEBRkU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2023 13:40:20 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F71114 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 10:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7B662574 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 17:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEA2BC433D2; Tue, 2 May 2023 17:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 18:40:14 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Justin Forbes , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmforbes@linuxtx.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Message-ID: References: <20230428153646.823736-1-jforbes@fedoraproject.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 07:15:20PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:07:41PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 04:24:38PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > Regarding EXPERT, we could drop it and do like the other architectures > > but we'll have randconfig occasionally hitting weird values that won't > > build (like -1). Not sure EXPERT helps here. > > AFAIU, randconfig does not randomize int values, it's probably random > people that do ;-) https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303232149.Chh6KhiI-lkp@intel.com with the randconfig here: https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230323/202303232149.Chh6KhiI-lkp@intel.com/config That said, it would fail on other architectures as well, maybe they are just not wired up in the build machines. -- Catalin