public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
	Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] iio: bu27034: Ensure reset is written
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 13:01:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFIw/KdApZe1euN8@fedora> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2301 bytes --]

The reset bit must be always written to the hardware no matter what value
is in a cache or register. Ensure this by using regmap_write_bits()
instead of the regmap_update_bits(). Furthermore, the RESET bit may be
self-clearing, so mark the SYSTEM_CONTROL register volatile to guarantee
we do also read the right state - should we ever need to read it.

Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Fixes: e52afbd61039 ("iio: light: ROHM BU27034 Ambient Light Sensor")

---
Changelog:
v1 => v2:
  - Fix SoB tag


I haven't verified if the reset bit is self-clearin as I did temporarily
give away the HW.

In worst case the bit is not self clearing - but we don't really
get performance penalty even if we set the register volatile because the
SYSTEM_CONTROL register only has the part-ID and the reset fields. The
part-id is only read once at probe.

---
 drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c b/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c
index 25c9b79574a5..740ebd86b6e5 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27034.c
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ struct bu27034_result {
 
 static const struct regmap_range bu27034_volatile_ranges[] = {
 	{
+		.range_min = BU27034_REG_SYSTEM_CONTROL,
+		.range_max = BU27034_REG_SYSTEM_CONTROL,
+	}, {
 		.range_min = BU27034_REG_MODE_CONTROL4,
 		.range_max = BU27034_REG_MODE_CONTROL4,
 	}, {
@@ -1272,7 +1275,7 @@ static int bu27034_chip_init(struct bu27034_data *data)
 	int ret, sel;
 
 	/* Reset */
-	ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, BU27034_REG_SYSTEM_CONTROL,
+	ret = regmap_write_bits(data->regmap, BU27034_REG_SYSTEM_CONTROL,
 			   BU27034_MASK_SW_RESET, BU27034_MASK_SW_RESET);
 	if (ret)
 		return dev_err_probe(data->dev, ret, "Sensor reset failed\n");

base-commit: 7fcbd72176076c44b47e8f68f0223c02c411f420
-- 
2.40.0


-- 
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =] 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2023-05-03 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-03 10:01 Matti Vaittinen [this message]
2023-05-06 18:27 ` [PATCH v2] iio: bu27034: Ensure reset is written Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-07  9:58   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-05-07 13:30     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFIw/KdApZe1euN8@fedora \
    --to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox