From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: rcupdate.h: Add missing parentheses around macro pointer dereference
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 13:33:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFLFMmGsGF578sg2@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230503203236.1587590-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 04:32:36PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> linux/rcupdate.h macros use the *p parameter without parentheses, e.g.:
>
> typeof(*p)
>
> rather than
>
> typeof(*(p))
>
> The following test-case shows how it can generate confusion due to C
> operator precedence being reversed compared to the expectations:
>
> #define m(p) \
> do { \
> __typeof__(*p) v = 0; \
> } while (0)
>
> void fct(unsigned long long *p1)
> {
> m(p1 + 1); /* works */
> m(1 + p1); /* broken */
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> Cc: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Regards,
Boqun
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index dcd2cf1e8326..1565012fa47f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -430,16 +430,16 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
>
> #ifdef __CHECKER__
> #define rcu_check_sparse(p, space) \
> - ((void)(((typeof(*p) space *)p) == p))
> + ((void)(((typeof(*(p)) space *)p) == p))
> #else /* #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
> #define rcu_check_sparse(p, space)
> #endif /* #else #ifdef __CHECKER__ */
>
> #define __unrcu_pointer(p, local) \
> ({ \
> - typeof(*p) *local = (typeof(*p) *__force)(p); \
> + typeof(*(p)) *local = (typeof(*(p)) *__force)(p); \
> rcu_check_sparse(p, __rcu); \
> - ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> + ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> })
> /**
> * unrcu_pointer - mark a pointer as not being RCU protected
> @@ -452,29 +452,29 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
>
> #define __rcu_access_pointer(p, local, space) \
> ({ \
> - typeof(*p) *local = (typeof(*p) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
> + typeof(*(p)) *local = (typeof(*(p)) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
> rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
> - ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> + ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> })
> #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, local, c, space) \
> ({ \
> /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
> - typeof(*p) *local = (typeof(*p) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
> + typeof(*(p)) *local = (typeof(*(p)) *__force)READ_ONCE(p); \
> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage"); \
> rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
> - ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> + ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> })
> #define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, local, c, space) \
> ({ \
> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage"); \
> rcu_check_sparse(p, space); \
> - ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
> + ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
> })
> #define __rcu_dereference_raw(p, local) \
> ({ \
> /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
> typeof(p) local = READ_ONCE(p); \
> - ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> + ((typeof(*(p)) __force __kernel *)(local)); \
> })
> #define rcu_dereference_raw(p) __rcu_dereference_raw(p, __UNIQUE_ID(rcu))
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 20:32 [RFC PATCH] rcu: rcupdate.h: Add missing parentheses around macro pointer dereference Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-05-03 20:33 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2023-05-03 22:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-05 0:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-05 13:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-05-05 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-05-04 1:17 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZFLFMmGsGF578sg2@boqun-archlinux \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox