Re: [PATCH] nvme: add cond_resched() to nvme_complete_batch()

Niklas Cassel
2023-05-04T10:12:58Z

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:39:53AM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 05:42:22PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:28:53AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:54:12PM +0800, jiweisun126@126.com wrote:
> > > > According to the above two logs, we can know the nvme_irq() cost too much
> > > > time, in the above case, about 4.8 second. And we can also know that the
> > > > main bottlenecks is in the competition for the spin lock pool->lock.
> > >
> > > I have a fix that makes pool->lock critical section much shorter and constant
> > > time. It was staged in mm tree for months, but mysteriously it's missing...
> >
> > Well this is certainly odd: the commit I'm referring to is in Linus' log, but
> > the file it modified is not updated. What kind of 'git' madness is this??
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a4de12a032fa6d0670aa0bb43a2bf9f812680d0f
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/mm/dmapool.c
> >
>
> Hmm, this is very interesting indeed.
>
> It looks like:
> a4de12a032fa ("dmapool: link blocks across pages") matches
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/patch/20230126215125.4069751-12-kbusch@meta.com/
> so everything good.
>
> However, the following commit:
> 2d55c16c0c54 ("dmapool: create/destroy cleanup")
> does not match what was on the list:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/patch/20230126215125.4069751-13-kbusch@meta.com/
>
>
>
> It kind of looks like
> 2d55c16c0c54 ("dmapool: create/destroy cleanup") is actually
> a revert of a4de12a032fa ("dmapool: link blocks across pages"),
> plus some additional changes. Scary.
>
>
>
> Additionally, it seems like the fix:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/patch/20230221165400.1595247-1-kbusch@meta.com/
> was never merged.
>
>
> Something is fishy here...
>
> (Perhaps the maintainer did a git revert instead of applying the fix...
> and accidentally squashed the revert with a proper commit...
> But even that does not make sense, as there simply seems to be too many
> lines changed in 2d55c16c0c54 ("dmapool: create/destroy cleanup") for that
> to be the case...)

It seems like the additional lines in
2d55c16c0c54 ("dmapool: create/destroy cleanup") is explained by the
maintainer (probably accidentally) reverting additional patches in that
very same commit.

It seems like that commit reverted all changes to mm/dmapool.c since v6.3:

$ git log --oneline 2d55c16c0c54325bf15286cfa6ba6c268036b9e4 --not v6.3 mm/dmapool.c
2d55c16c0c54 dmapool: create/destroy cleanup
a4de12a032fa dmapool: link blocks across pages
9d062a8a4c6d dmapool: don't memset on free twice
887aef615818 dmapool: simplify freeing
2591b516533b dmapool: consolidate page initialization
36d1a28921a4 dmapool: rearrange page alloc failure handling
52e7d5653979 dmapool: move debug code to own functions
19f504584038 dmapool: speedup DMAPOOL_DEBUG with init_on_alloc
347e4e44c0a9 dmapool: cleanup integer types
65216545436b dmapool: use sysfs_emit() instead of scnprintf()
7f796d141c07 dmapool: remove checks for dev == NULL

$ git diff v6.3 2d55c16c0c54325bf15286cfa6ba6c268036b9e4 mm/dmapool.c
<nothing>

Should probably tell Andrew so that he has time to send out a new PR
before the merge window closes. (I added him in To: .)

He should probably pick up this fix too:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/patch/20230221165400.1595247-1-kbusch@meta.com/

Kind regards,
Niklas