From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6D2C77B7C for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 18:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229675AbjEDSAn (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2023 14:00:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50202 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229449AbjEDSAl (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2023 14:00:41 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7C859F5 for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 11:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB5261426 for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 18:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97661C433D2; Thu, 4 May 2023 18:00:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1683223239; bh=06QOaU+SpcqPDkz/s2qgwS7uJCNUwPpQEaMShjUZgRQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RZDSNz4lBk8iewUYJAPWmA3pIAWwgyW/Q5ooAHOoyBhT9tBeLHqklA0VwkbHK6tA5 LEySSXmzAO7/WM7k+uR7EvoF6FuwIC3PVzfYAcvZafjEmFQO9+G65Lmj7zU9Ip4jG7 ETB6dkCVWRPUQX76eg0ZarsKcVt6up7bRax/pCJQSykF2h0f3fuE+JTSluPNQN4kSC 4IcmuxdbOy93iNgwV98+Fr+DYaaUffYNGQfCi60+T6rifyhyxU5cX/SBCVBsqyvhbs AyQFC1yKQ4hwwHkKbuOc2CYdYR5XbdoUYvPNFnDO/Vt30sUEEisHLBa0wOkeWCfqaz oyP+/H4KfmhZg== Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 23:30:34 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Nathan Chancellor , LKML , Linux Phy , Nick Desaulniers , llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [GIT PULL]: Generic phy updates for v6.4 Message-ID: References: <20230504150624.GA1000378@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04-05-23, 10:23, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:31 AM Vinod Koul wrote: > > Sorry between vacation and travel, this was missed. > > > > No worries we have process to deal with this, so this shall go in as > > fixes.. I will do the needful shortly > > You need to do it *now*. It was already done a bit ago and applied to my fixes and should be in -next tomorrow. I will wait a day before sending you fixes update. > You should never have sent the pull request to me in the first place > if you hadn't checked the status in linux-next. > > The point of linux-next is to find failures. And if you don't then > *care* about the failures, then it has all become entirely pointless, > and it's effectively the same as if it had never been there in the > first place. > > So this needs to get fixed *PRONTO*, and it needs to never ever happen again. Ack, agree I should have paid it more attention. Between vacation and travel and stuff I have missed it this time, will ensure this doesn't happen again. > > Because if it does happen, I will consider your code to effectively > never have been in linux-next, and thus just not be an option for > pulling. > > This isn't debatable. You don't put things in linux-next, ignore the > reports, and then send things upstream anyway. > > If you don't have time to check the status of your tree in linux-next, > you don't have the time to do a pull request. That's just how it > works. > > Linus -- ~Vinod