linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
	Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com>,
	"Morten Rasmussen" <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	"Abhijeet Dharmapurikar" <adharmap@quicinc.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: Consider CPU contention in frequency & load-balance busiest CPU selection
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 10:19:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFcKus/4Jo5oRuU8@chenyu5-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8276e5ce-b1f6-19e2-095b-abc6952bd1c7@arm.com>

On 2023-05-05 at 20:02:36 +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> Hi Chenyu,
> 
> On 05/05/2023 09:10, Chen Yu wrote:
> > On 2023-04-06 at 17:50:30 +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> Use new cpu_boosted_util_cfs() instead of cpu_util_cfs().
> >>
> >> The former returns max(util_avg, runnable_avg) capped by max CPU
> >> capacity. CPU contention is thereby considered through runnable_avg.
> >>
> >> The change in load-balance only affects migration type `migrate_util`.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> >>
> > Tested on Intel Sapphire Rapids which has 2x56C/112T = 224 CPUs.
> > The test tries to check if this is any impact on find_busiest_queue()
> > so it was tested with cpufreq governor performance.
> > The baseline is the 6.3 sched/core branch on top of
> > Commit 67fff302fc445a ("sched/fair: Introduce SIS_CURRENT to wake up"),
> > and compared to the code with current patch applied.
> > 
> > In summary no obvious difference and some small improvements on tbench
> > were observed so far:
> 
> many thanks for the test results!
> 
> Could you share the parameter lists you use for the individual tests?
> This would make it easier to understand the results and rerun the tests
> on similar machines.
>
Yes. The test parameters are all tested with cpufreq governor performance,
turbo disabled and C-states > C1 are disabled.

netperf:
Loopback test. Launched 1 netserver. Launched 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%
of the online CPUs number of netperf client. Tested type is TCP_RR and UDP_RR
respectively.

for i in $(seq 1 $nr_netperf); do
    netperf -4 -H 127.0.0.1 -t $type -c -C -l 100 &
done

tbench:
Loopback test. Launched 1 tbench_srv. Launched 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%
of the online CPUs number of tbench client.

tbench -t 100 $nr_tbench 127.0.0.1


schbench:
Number of worker threads is 25% of the online CPUs. Number of message threads is
1, 2, 4, 8 respectively.

schbench -m $nr_message -t $nr_worker -r 100


hackbench:
Number of hackbench group is 1, 2, 4, 8 respectively. Work types are "process" and "threads"
respectively. IPC mode are "pipe" and "sockets". The number of fd in each group is 12.5% of
the CPU number.

hackbench -g $nr_group --$work_type --$ipc_mode -l 5000000 -s 100 -f $num_fds


thanks,
Chenyu

      reply	other threads:[~2023-05-07  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-06 15:50 [PATCH 0/1] sched: Consider CPU contention in frequency & load-balance busiest CPU selection Dietmar Eggemann
2023-04-06 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Dietmar Eggemann
2023-04-29 14:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-03 17:13     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-05-04 15:23       ` Qais Yousef
2023-05-11 15:25         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-05-15 19:18           ` Qais Yousef
2023-05-03 16:08   ` Vincent Guittot
2023-05-04 17:11     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-05-05  8:22       ` Vincent Guittot
2023-05-05 18:16         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-05-05  7:10   ` Chen Yu
2023-05-05 18:02     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-05-07  2:19       ` Chen Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFcKus/4Jo5oRuU8@chenyu5-mobl1 \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=adharmap@quicinc.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kajetan.puchalski@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).