From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA650C7EE2A for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 12:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235384AbjEIMaY (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2023 08:30:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40306 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235316AbjEIMaV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2023 08:30:21 -0400 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (www.zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3FBC2103 for ; Tue, 9 May 2023 05:30:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=sang-engineering.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=O7ltxVMMcMInBof4d0OnDbKkJnZu QoKhhWJSzl0H97U=; b=Kmeo0nFdRVC8jbGCGJOi5s5nX67DVq31zHV1bQtwOLkg 3PEsLemIQd6u1ARAKt+g3MH1VSGZEvX5V1lOlQsGCiOantjk+rYPpzfx9ZlbMib3 Xm4C+SbD4ZN2vgb7dLJTBTidFxoe7m6ZdPJeBjCNbNKdD9iN+w30deWzWz2R+8U= Received: (qmail 2075146 invoked from network); 9 May 2023 14:30:15 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 9 May 2023 14:30:15 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@JFLc6kH72q0ujnsI Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 14:30:15 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: rcar-pci-host: add optional regulators Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , Yoshihiro Shimoda , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230508104557.47889-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20230508104557.47889-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I couldn't find one and took what I think is the most used pattern. But > > I wasn't entirely sure, this is why the series is still RFC. >=20 > Upon second thought, shouldn't these supplies be part of a PCIe > connector subnode, as they are not properties of the PCIe host > controller itself? Beats me. Current practice is to put it in the host controller. --XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmRaPNIACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYcnA/+Mf7e2Kx1VZ9YMEhvAsnupmI/+OELVuUOwKhEBKroO1ssgozVcim8Bs6X HJGf9d2Xgoq2CrKrs3s6V7Bdl/lxQcITIpstFNZ66EcJTlBy6Llqw7eNPPkfIQCq OZEyhxKactnfiD1ClQ6LBUqymbclqn2y54yGvnFL5ZUMlOZD1PA561IOgf6f4WOT 5fVZ3yHi56dDwLzB0trIvCG0Uz55J+BpUhH6VJz5uAEsc3XHmG9EU8T66dGjqorp MEGpRDNxh+Xxgl+XociCHks6dOfsuWwIIk0hxto56uZbd+R3zI3IdTvpd3siUy50 vSV3fY96S3PpUpyY/GpnvA9epf4NskvyATc2IDhUboQjhx/E5F6I4KRFOprP7kDq MIJfr2SEk5EFUcVcUdYed6/dUxvJXsnXrzK0HIGvkLvIxQi7ZUEimrvbAnVK9+gT Ve1o6LFmRJphDAjH1/JT5dchQQQqTwk2YKV4Fgd3fTJAwMpprmrH2LIaeWSVIQgw SwnRcGBc3rGVBhRUuua19JyieEtEUz14ClynDg2uvKc67iqlFwEcH/Tx4lbCAP0+ uMgAWHfIeONCveBwa6GbDCj6n/cqpDVW+FCos3jSlhuQk+m2P3TTLNUyYsFv4OnA lu7E34zT0iSt+FrgmawchAz9qdEUnwgavurNkc2gNUtDWFs1t0Q= =d+5H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XejAdsIjL01QPq9Q--