public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	<robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize()
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 15:42:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFtK/NS8rzCx9Mus@chao-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230510060611.12950-2-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 02:06:06PM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>Define a 32-bit parameter and consolidate the two bools into it.
>
>__linearize() has two bool parameters write and fetch. And new flag
>will be needed to support new feature (e.g. LAM needs a flag to skip
>address untag under some conditions).
>
>No functional change intended.
>
>In the follow-up patches, the new parameter will be extended for LAM.
>
>Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>

one nit below

>---
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c     | 19 +++++++++++++------
> arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h |  4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>index 936a397a08cd..9508836e8a35 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ static unsigned insn_alignment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned size)
> static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> 				       struct segmented_address addr,
> 				       unsigned *max_size, unsigned size,
>-				       bool write, bool fetch,
>-				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear)
>+				       u32 flags, enum x86emul_mode mode,
>+				       ulong *linear)
> {
> 	struct desc_struct desc;
> 	bool usable;
>@@ -696,6 +696,8 @@ static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> 	u32 lim;
> 	u16 sel;
> 	u8  va_bits;
>+	bool fetch = !!(flags & X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
>+	bool write = !!(flags & X86EMUL_F_WRITE);
> 
> 	la = seg_base(ctxt, addr.seg) + addr.ea;
> 	*max_size = 0;
>@@ -757,7 +759,11 @@ static int linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> 		     ulong *linear)
> {
> 	unsigned max_size;
>-	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, write, false,
>+	u32 flags = 0;
>+
>+	if (write)
>+		flags |= X86EMUL_F_WRITE;

this can be more dense:

	u32 flags = write ? X86EMUL_F_WRITE : 0;

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-10  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-10  6:06 [PATCH v8 0/6] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize() Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  7:42   ` Chao Gao [this message]
2023-05-11  1:25     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-11  9:58       ` David Laight
2023-05-12  1:35         ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10 12:41   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-11  1:30     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR4.LAM_SUP Binbin Wu
2023-05-11 12:50   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-12  1:33     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-12 10:49       ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-18  4:01         ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR3.LAM_{U48,U57} Binbin Wu
2023-05-10  8:58   ` Chao Gao
2023-05-11  1:27     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-10 11:59   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce untag_addr() in kvm_x86_ops Binbin Wu
2023-05-11  6:03   ` Chao Gao
2023-05-11  9:18     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-11 10:37       ` Chao Gao
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] KVM: x86: Untag address when LAM applicable Binbin Wu
2023-05-11  6:28   ` Chao Gao
2023-05-10  6:06 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] KVM: x86: Expose LAM feature to userspace VMM Binbin Wu
2023-05-12 12:49   ` Huang, Kai
2023-05-16  3:30     ` Binbin Wu
2023-05-25  2:08 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Binbin Wu
2023-05-25 15:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06  9:26     ` Binbin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFtK/NS8rzCx9Mus@chao-email \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox