From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Cc: alison.schofield@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bwidawsk@kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/23] PCI/AER: Forward RCH downstream port-detected errors to the CXL.mem dev handler
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 17:01:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG/anZ78FukSpERs@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZG/TKOgMTSljryHN@rric.localdomain>
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:29:58PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> eOn 24.05.23 16:32:35, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 06:22:13PM -0500, Terry Bowman wrote:
> > > From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> > >
> > > In Restricted CXL Device (RCD) mode a CXL device is exposed as an
> > > RCiEP, but CXL downstream and upstream ports are not enumerated and
> > > not visible in the PCIe hierarchy. Protocol and link errors are sent
> > > to an RCEC.
> > >
> > > Restricted CXL host (RCH) downstream port-detected errors are signaled
> > > as internal AER errors, either Uncorrectable Internal Error (UIE) or
> > > Corrected Internal Errors (CIE).
> >
> > From the parallelism with RCD above, I first thought that RCH devices
> > were non-RCD mode and *were* enumerated as part of the PCIe hierarchy,
> > but actually I suspect it's more like the following?
> >
> > ... but CXL downstream and upstream ports are not enumerated and not
> > visible in the PCIe hierarchy.
> >
> > Protocol and link errors from these non-enumerated ports are
> > signaled as internal AER errors ... via a CXL RCEC.
>
> Exactly, except the RCEC is standard PCIe and also must not
> necessarily on the same PCI bus as the CXL RCiEPs are.
So make it "RCEC" instead of "CXL RCEC", I guess? PCIe r6.0, sec
7.9.10.3, allows an RCEC to be associated with RCiEPs on different
buses, so nothing to see there.
> > > The error source is the id of the RCEC.
> >
> > This seems odd; I assume this refers to the RCEC's AER Error Source
> > Identification register, and the ERR_COR or ERR_FATAL/NONFATAL Source
> > Identification would ordinarily be the Requester ID of the RCiEP that
> > "sent" the Error Message. But you're saying it's actually the ID of
> > the *RCEC*, not the RCiEP?
>
> Right, the downstream port has its own AER ext capability in
> non-config (io mapped) RCRB register range. Errors originating from
> there are signaled as internal AER errors via the RCEC *with* the
> RCEC's Requester ID. Code walks through all associated CXL endpoints,
> determines the dport and checks its AER.
>
> There is also an RDPAS structure defined in CXL but that is only a
> different way to provide the RCEC to dport association instead of
> using the RCEC's Endpoint Association Extended Capability. In the end
> we get all associated RCHs and check the AER of all their dports.
>
> The upstream port is signaled using the RCiEP's AER. CXL spec is
> strict here: "Upstream Port RCRB shall not implement the AER Extended
> Capability." The RCiEP's requestor ID is used then and its config
> space the AER is in.
>
> CXL.cachemem errors are reported with the RCiEP as requester
> too. Status is in the CXL RAS cap and the UIE or CIE is set
> respectively in the AER status of the RCiEP.
>
> > We're going to call pci_aer_handle_error() as well, to handle the
> > non-internal errors, and I'm pretty sure that path expects the RCiEP
> > ID there.
> >
> > Whatever the answer, I'm not sure this sentence is actually relevant
> > to this patch, since this patch doesn't read PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC or
> > look at struct aer_err_source.id.
>
> The source id is used in aer_process_err_devices() which finally calls
> handle_error_source() for the device with the requestor id. This is
> the place where cxl_rch_handle_error() checks if it is an RCEC that
> received an internal error and has cxl devices connected to it. Then,
> the request is forwarded to the cxl_mem handler which also needs to
> check the dport now. That is, pcie_walk_rcec() in
> cxl_rch_handle_error() is called with the RCEC's pci handle,
> cxl_rch_handle_error_iter() with the RCiEP's pci handle.
I'm still not sure this is relevant. Isn't that last sentence just
the way we always use pcie_walk_rcec()?
If there's something *different* here about CXL, and it's important to
this patch, sure. But I don't see that yet. Maybe a comment in the
code if you think it's important to clarify something there.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-23 23:21 [PATCH v4 00/23] cxl/pci: Add support for RCH RAS error handling Terry Bowman
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] cxl/acpi: Probe RCRB later during RCH downstream port creation Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 10:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-02 14:16 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] cxl/rch: Prepare for caching the MMIO mapped PCIe AER capability Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 10:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-02 14:53 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] cxl: Rename member @dport of struct cxl_dport to @dev Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 10:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] cxl/core/regs: Add @dev to cxl_register_map Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-02 15:11 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] cxl/pci: Refactor component register discovery for reuse Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 10:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] cxl/acpi: Moving add_host_bridge_uport() around Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 10:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] cxl/acpi: Directly bind the CEDT detected CHBCR to the Host Bridge's port Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 12:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-02 15:42 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-23 23:21 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] cxl/regs: Remove early capability checks in Component Register setup Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 12:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] cxl/pci: Early setup RCH dport component registers from RCRB Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 12:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-02 15:45 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] cxl/port: Store the port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-02 15:58 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] cxl/port: Store the downstream port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] cxl/pci: Store the endpoint's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dev_state Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] cxl/hdm: Use stored Component Register mappings to map HDM decoder capability Terry Bowman
2023-05-24 1:12 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-24 9:49 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-25 20:23 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-01 13:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] cxl/pci: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_dev_state Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port AER register discovery Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-01 13:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] PCI/AER: Refactor cper_print_aer() for use by CXL driver module Terry Bowman
2023-05-24 16:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-25 21:38 ` Terry Bowman
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] cxl/pci: Update CXL error logging to use RAS register address Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] cxl/pci: Prepare for logging RCH downstream port protocol errors Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-01 14:06 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 14:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port error logging Terry Bowman
2023-06-01 14:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] PCI/AER: Forward RCH downstream port-detected errors to the CXL.mem dev handler Terry Bowman
2023-05-24 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-25 21:29 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-25 22:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-05-25 22:28 ` Robert Richter
2023-06-01 14:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] PCI/AER: Unmask RCEC internal errors to enable RCH downstream port error handling Terry Bowman
2023-05-24 21:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-25 22:08 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-26 20:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-01 14:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-02 16:41 ` Robert Richter
2023-05-23 23:29 ` [PATCH v4 00/23] cxl/pci: Add support for RCH RAS error handling - CHANGELOG Terry Bowman
2023-05-24 1:39 ` [PATCH v4 00/23] cxl/pci: Add support for RCH RAS error handling Terry Bowman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZG/anZ78FukSpERs@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox