public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Track supported ARCH_CAPABILITIES in kvm_caps
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 16:32:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG3LpLR7itO4dI8U@chao-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc72da6d-2f70-63c8-dd6b-f8f8df862b89@intel.com>

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:14:10PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>On 5/24/2023 2:16 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>> to avoid computing the supported value at runtime every time.
>> 
>> Toggle the ARCH_CAP_SKIP_VMENTRY_L1DFLUSH bit when l1tf_vmx_mitigation
>> is modified to achieve the same result as runtime computing.
>
>It's not the same result.

it is because ...

>
>In kvm_get_arch_capabilities(), host's value is honored. I.e., when host
>supports ARCH_CAP_SKIP_VMENTRY_L1DFLUSH, l1tf_vmx_mitigation doesn't make any
>difference to the result.

... l1tf_vmx_mitigation should be VMENTER_L1D_FLUSH_NOT_REQUIRED in this
case. l1tf_vmx_mitigation cannot be VMENTER_L1D_FLUSH_NEVER.

>
>> Opportunistically, add a comment to document the problem of allowing
>> changing the supported value of ARCH_CAPABILITIES and the reason why
>> we don't fix it.
>> 
>> No functional change intended.
>> 
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZGZhW%2Fx5OWPmx1qD@google.com/
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZGeU9sYTPxqNGSqI@google.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c     |  7 ++++---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.h     |  1 +
>>   3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 44fb619803b8..8274ef5e89e5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -309,10 +309,31 @@ static int vmx_setup_l1d_flush(enum vmx_l1d_flush_state l1tf)
>>   	l1tf_vmx_mitigation = l1tf;
>> -	if (l1tf != VMENTER_L1D_FLUSH_NEVER)
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Update static keys and supported arch capabilities according to
>> +	 * the new mitigation state.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * ARCH_CAP_SKIP_VMENTRY_L1DFLUSH is toggled because if we do cache
>> +	 * flushes for L1 guests on (nested) vmlaunch/vmresume to L2, L1
>> +	 * guests can skip the flush and if we don't, then L1 guests need
>> +	 * to do a flush.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Toggling ARCH_CAP_SKIP_VMENTRY_L1DFLUSH may present inconsistent
>> +	 * model to the guest, e.g., if userspace isn't careful, a VM can
>> +	 * have vCPUs with different values for ARCH_CAPABILITIES. But
>> +	 * there is almost no chance to fix the issue. Because, to present
>> +	 * a consistent model, KVM essentially needs to disallow changing
>> +	 * the module param after VMs/vCPUs have been created, but that
>> +	 * would prevent userspace from toggling the param while VMs are
>> +	 * running, e.g., in response to a new vulnerability.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (l1tf != VMENTER_L1D_FLUSH_NEVER) {
>>   		static_branch_enable(&vmx_l1d_should_flush);
>> -	else
>> +		kvm_caps.supported_arch_cap |= ARCH_CAP_SKIP_VMENTRY_L1DFLUSH;
>> +	} else {
>>   		static_branch_disable(&vmx_l1d_should_flush);
>> +		kvm_caps.supported_arch_cap &= ~ARCH_CAP_SKIP_VMENTRY_L1DFLUSH;
>> +	}
>>   	if (l1tf == VMENTER_L1D_FLUSH_COND)
>>   		static_branch_enable(&vmx_l1d_flush_cond);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index c0778ca39650..2408b5f554b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -1672,7 +1672,7 @@ static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
>>   {
>>   	switch (msr->index) {
>>   	case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
>> -		msr->data = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
>> +		msr->data = kvm_caps.supported_arch_cap;
>>   		break;
>>   	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
>>   		msr->data = kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap;
>> @@ -7156,7 +7156,7 @@ static void kvm_probe_msr_to_save(u32 msr_index)
>>   			return;
>>   		break;
>>   	case MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL:
>> -		if (!(kvm_get_arch_capabilities() & ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR))
>> +		if (!(kvm_caps.supported_arch_cap & ARCH_CAP_TSX_CTRL_MSR))
>>   			return;
>>   		break;
>>   	default:
>> @@ -9532,6 +9532,7 @@ static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
>>   		kvm_caps.max_guest_tsc_khz = max;
>>   	}
>>   	kvm_caps.default_tsc_scaling_ratio = 1ULL << kvm_caps.tsc_scaling_ratio_frac_bits;
>> +	kvm_caps.supported_arch_cap = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
>>   	kvm_init_msr_lists();
>>   	return 0;
>> @@ -11895,7 +11896,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   	if (r)
>>   		goto free_guest_fpu;
>> -	vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
>> +	vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = kvm_caps.supported_arch_cap;
>>   	vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
>>   	kvm_xen_init_vcpu(vcpu);
>>   	kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(vcpu);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>> index c544602d07a3..d3e524bcc169 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct kvm_caps {
>>   	u64 supported_xcr0;
>>   	u64 supported_xss;
>>   	u64 supported_perf_cap;
>> +	u64 supported_arch_cap;
>>   };
>>   void kvm_spurious_fault(void);
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-24  6:16 [PATCH v2 0/3] MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES cleanups Chao Gao
2023-05-24  6:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Track supported ARCH_CAPABILITIES in kvm_caps Chao Gao
2023-05-24  8:14   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-24  8:32     ` Chao Gao [this message]
2023-05-25  2:17       ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-06-06 16:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-24  6:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: Correct the name for skipping VMENTER l1d flush Chao Gao
2023-05-24  8:25   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-24  6:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/cpu, KVM: Use helper function to read MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES Chao Gao
2023-05-24  8:19   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-06-06 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES cleanups Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZG3LpLR7itO4dI8U@chao-email \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox